Discussion:
Atheism is indeed a religion, they worship the Marem Recti.
(too old to reply)
Mark Henderson
2012-01-02 17:59:16 UTC
Permalink
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Gunner Asch
2012-01-02 20:37:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting that.

"See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."


Sucks to be some of the atheists who keep claiming that they dont have a
religion and many keep claiming they have never denied there are god(s)

<VBG>

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Lanskee Shuru
2012-01-02 23:00:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Sucks to be some of the atheists who keep claiming that they dont have a
religion and many keep claiming they have never denied there are god(s)
<VBG>
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch
My religion is Animal Rights Atheism as outlined by the
Goddess Joleeenee, who happens to hate Christians
and the RCC as well as the Moslems.
Gunner Asch
2012-01-03 09:38:15 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:00:11 -0800 (PST), Lanskee Shuru
Post by Lanskee Shuru
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Sucks to be some of the atheists who keep claiming that they dont have a
religion and many keep claiming they have never denied there are god(s)
<VBG>
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch
My religion is Animal Rights Atheism as outlined by the
Goddess Joleeenee, who happens to hate Christians
and the RCC as well as the Moslems.
Good for you! Sounds like an interesting religion.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Cedro Wooly
2012-01-04 07:50:35 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:00:11 -0800 (PST), Lanskee Shuru
Post by Lanskee Shuru
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Sucks to be some of the atheists who keep claiming that they dont have a
religion and many keep claiming they have never denied there are god(s)
<VBG>
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch
My religion is Animal Rights Atheism as outlined by the
Goddess Joleeenee, who happens to hate Christians
and the RCC as well as the Moslems.
Actually we don't give a shit. You really don't matter in the scheme
of mankind.
Budikka666
2012-01-02 23:41:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
That's hilarious coming from someone whose screen handle means "gay"!
Nice sarcasm.

Budikka
Zacharias Mulletstein
2012-01-03 07:20:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Budikka666
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting that.
That's hilarious coming from someone whose screen handle means "gay"!
Nice sarcasm.
That's hilarious coming from a gay hater.
--
I am a Fundamentalist Christian Pentecostal Warrior for the One lamb virgin,
Jesus Christ.
Gunner Asch
2012-01-03 09:39:54 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:41:24 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
Post by Budikka666
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
That's hilarious coming from someone whose screen handle means "gay"!
Nice sarcasm.
Budikka
Gunner Asch means "gay"?

Or is that simply wishful thinking on your part? Sorry lubkins..I dont
swing wif da bois. I rather like ladies.

But the offer in your email was sweet. Not my way to swing..but sweet.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Paul David Wright
2012-01-03 06:05:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting that.
Yes, we know how much you support a LIE.
--
PDW

Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Colanth
2012-01-03 17:44:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron. Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary. That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
Mogons
2012-01-03 23:47:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.

mogons
Gunner Asch
2012-01-04 04:28:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?

Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.

Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Olrik
2012-01-04 05:39:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Colanth
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron. Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary. That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
You judge people.
Mogons
2012-02-18 00:21:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.

mogons
Deucalion
2012-02-18 05:54:37 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name. We just recently taught him how to spell
it.

He's no Buddhist.
Shall not be infringed
2012-02-18 15:12:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
Gunner Asch
2012-02-19 19:30:43 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.

Gunner
--
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Shall not be infringed
2012-02-19 21:50:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.
Gunner
I know that all of the names on the Chinese maps have changed since I
was in High School.

But there can only be >>>ONE<<< correct spelling for a Buddhist sect,
according to Bob Brock.
Deucalion
2012-02-20 05:58:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.
Gunner
Gunner, why do you lie when you know that anyone can simply look and
see that you are lying?

http://www.eudict.com/?lang=japeng&word=rensai

rensai serialization, serial story

A search for "Rensai" lists no cites supporting your assertion in the
first six pages.

A search for "Rensai Buddhism" lists several monks with that name, but
no sect. 

Now, there is a "rensei karate" that has some Buddhist/Zen
connatations, but that hardly makes a sect and it's not spelled the
same.

Now, lets to to the correct spelling and see what we get shall we?

A search of the word "Renzai" includes several links to Zen and
Buddhism."

A search for the term "rinzai zen buddhism" lists a lot of links to
buddhism, including this one which lists quotations from the sect.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/257927/Teachings-of-Rinzai

That is rinzai and it is not you.
Shall not be infringed
2012-02-22 01:19:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deucalion
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.
Gunner
Gunner, why do you lie when you know that anyone can simply look and
see that you are lying?
http://www.eudict.com/?lang=japeng&word=rensai
rensai  serialization, serial story
A search for "Rensai" lists no cites supporting your assertion in the
first six pages.
A search for "Rensai Buddhism" lists several monks with that name, but
no sect.
Now, there is a "rensei karate" that has some Buddhist/Zen
connatations, but that hardly makes a sect and it's not spelled the
same.
Now, lets to to the correct spelling and see what we get shall we?
A search of the word "Renzai" includes several links to Zen and
Buddhism."
A search for the term "rinzai zen buddhism" lists a lot of links to
buddhism, including this one which lists quotations from the sect.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/257927/Teachings-of-Rinzai
That is rinzai and it is not you.
Don't you just love it when an atheist insists than someone else has
to be a certain type of religion???
Gunner Asch
2012-02-25 19:27:12 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:19:58 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.
Gunner
Gunner, why do you lie when you know that anyone can simply look and
see that you are lying?
http://www.eudict.com/?lang=japeng&word=rensai
rensai  serialization, serial story
A search for "Rensai" lists no cites supporting your assertion in the
first six pages.
A search for "Rensai Buddhism" lists several monks with that name, but
no sect.
Now, there is a "rensei karate" that has some Buddhist/Zen
connatations, but that hardly makes a sect and it's not spelled the
same.
Now, lets to to the correct spelling and see what we get shall we?
A search of the word "Renzai" includes several links to Zen and
Buddhism."
A search for the term "rinzai zen buddhism" lists a lot of links to
buddhism, including this one which lists quotations from the sect.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/257927/Teachings-of-Rinzai
That is rinzai and it is not you.
From Wiki....

"The time during which Rinzai Zen was established in Japan also saw the
rise of the samurai to power. Along with early imperial support, Rinzai
came to enjoy the patronage of this newly ascendant warrior class; as
the Rinzai style of Zen practice may be characterized as somewhat
martial or sharp (following in the spirit of Linji Yixuan), this is
perhaps not surprising. In this regard, Rinzai is often contrasted with
another sect of Zen deeply established in Japan, So-to-, which has been
called more gentle and even rustic in spirit. A Japanese saying reflects
these perceptions: "Rinzai for the Sho-gun, So-to- for the peasants" "

And from another site:

"Pure Land Buddhism is Zen, essentially. Most of the Ch'an (Zen)
traditions that survived in China became Pure Land. The Zen that came to
Japan was primarily transmitted by the Soto and Renzai sects, which
still survive today.
All that aside, the samurai held to Buddhism because it allowed them a
handle to understand the transient nature of reality, a fact they faced
daily as warriors.
All mysticism and dogma aside, Buddhism is less a pacifist belief than a
compassionate belief. And if you will note, the strikes we learn in
Kendo and iaido are not maiming or crippling strikes, but killing blows,
often quickly and cleanly killing blows. Campassion in all things, even
in death. A warrior accepts the weight of karma in taking a life, but
strives to do so as compassionately as possible.
In the end, the simple truth has already been stated here before. We
aren't learning to kill with swords, we are learning kendo; a budo
practice devoted to the betterment of self, mind and body, through the
application of the principles of the sword. We practice to better
ourselves, and by bettering ourselves, to better interact with everyone
else. This practice is essential Buddhism.
Conflict arises only where we sow the seeds. "
Post by Shall not be infringed
Don't you just love it when an atheist insists than someone else has
to be a certain type of religion???
Indeed. <VBG>

Atheism, just another faith based religious belief

And defined as a religion by SCOTUS

Gunner
--
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Deucalion
2012-02-26 05:29:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:19:58 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
Post by Gunner Asch
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:12:51 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
Post by Shall not be infringed
Post by Deucalion
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:21:13 -0800 (PST), Mogons
Post by Mogons
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Mogons
Post by Mark Henderson
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Ayup....thanks for posting  that.
"See Wis. Admin. Code DOC 309.61(d)(3), cited in Kaufman v.
McCaughtry, 2004 WL 257133, at *9. Atheism is, among other things, a
school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and
importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are
satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman's religion for purposes of the
First Amendment claims he is attempting to raise."
Which is not the same thing as "atheism is a religion" moron.  Go back
to claiming to have been a mercenary.  That doesn't make you sound
like a drug-soaked idjit, just a lying moron.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Or claiming he's a Buddhist. His signature alone proves otherwise.
mogons
How so?
Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Ill be waiting with amusement for you response.
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
                                   Gunner Asch- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
the third step of the eightfold path.
mogons
Gunner has gone for years claiming to be a particular Buddhist sect
and mis-spelling the name.  We just recently taught him how to spell
it.
He's no Buddhist.
So which Chinese dialect are you spelling it in?
If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find both Renzai and
Rensai listed as spellings for my sect.
Gunner
Gunner, why do you lie when you know that anyone can simply look and
see that you are lying?
http://www.eudict.com/?lang=japeng&word=rensai
rensai  serialization, serial story
A search for "Rensai" lists no cites supporting your assertion in the
first six pages.
A search for "Rensai Buddhism" lists several monks with that name, but
no sect.
Now, there is a "rensei karate" that has some Buddhist/Zen
connatations, but that hardly makes a sect and it's not spelled the
same.
Now, lets to to the correct spelling and see what we get shall we?
A search of the word "Renzai" includes several links to Zen and
Buddhism."
A search for the term "rinzai zen buddhism" lists a lot of links to
buddhism, including this one which lists quotations from the sect.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/257927/Teachings-of-Rinzai
That is rinzai and it is not you.
From gunner, "If one uses Google as a reference point..one will find
both Renzai and Rensai listed as spellings for my sect." Are you now
claiming that you have really learned how to spell it? That's a
really big step for you.
Post by Gunner Asch
From Wiki....
"The time during which Rinzai Zen was established in Japan also saw the
rise of the samurai to power. Along with early imperial support, Rinzai
came to enjoy the patronage of this newly ascendant warrior class; as
the Rinzai style of Zen practice may be characterized as somewhat
martial or sharp (following in the spirit of Linji Yixuan), this is
perhaps not surprising. In this regard, Rinzai is often contrasted with
another sect of Zen deeply established in Japan, So-to-, which has been
called more gentle and even rustic in spirit. A Japanese saying reflects
these perceptions: "Rinzai for the Sho-gun, So-to- for the peasants" "
You need to reference sites for cites gunner. For the one below, you
not only didn't reference the site so that one can look it up, they
also misspelled Rinzai. Face it gunner, if you haven't learned how to
spell it, you have a long way to go before you can actually call
yourself one.
Post by Gunner Asch
"Pure Land Buddhism is Zen, essentially. Most of the Ch'an (Zen)
traditions that survived in China became Pure Land. The Zen that came to
Japan was primarily transmitted by the Soto and Renzai sects, which
still survive today.
All that aside, the samurai held to Buddhism because it allowed them a
handle to understand the transient nature of reality, a fact they faced
daily as warriors.
All mysticism and dogma aside, Buddhism is less a pacifist belief than a
compassionate belief. And if you will note, the strikes we learn in
Kendo and iaido are not maiming or crippling strikes, but killing blows,
often quickly and cleanly killing blows. Campassion in all things, even
in death. A warrior accepts the weight of karma in taking a life, but
strives to do so as compassionately as possible.
In the end, the simple truth has already been stated here before. We
aren't learning to kill with swords, we are learning kendo; a budo
practice devoted to the betterment of self, mind and body, through the
application of the principles of the sword. We practice to better
ourselves, and by bettering ourselves, to better interact with everyone
else. This practice is essential Buddhism.
Conflict arises only where we sow the seeds. "
Post by Shall not be infringed
Don't you just love it when an atheist insists than someone else has
to be a certain type of religion???
Indeed. <VBG>
You and cheese need to get your facts straight. I'm not an atheist.
In fact, I'd venture to say that I'm a better Buddhist than you are
and I'm not one of them either. Of course, neither are you.
Post by Gunner Asch
Atheism, just another faith based religious belief
And defined as a religion by SCOTUS
Gunner
Colanth
2012-01-02 22:41:07 UTC
Permalink
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
--
“The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362
admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't
love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision.” - Lynn
Lavner
Benjamin Peroxide
2012-01-02 23:29:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to start
was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a
supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said. "

Failure to object to atheists worshiping male rectums noted.
Greegor
2012-01-03 15:36:36 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 2, 5:29 pm, Benjamin Peroxide <***@Use-Author-
[...]
Post by Benjamin Peroxide
Failure to object to atheists worshiping male rectums noted.
Does that BUM you out?
Colanth
2012-01-03 15:54:41 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:29:36 +0000 (UTC), Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to start
was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a
supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said. "
Look up the term "legal fiction". That's all it is - it was expedient
to not have to invent a whole new classification of things and link it
to existing rights.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
W.T.S.
2012-01-03 19:34:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:29:36 +0000 (UTC), Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to start
was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a
supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said. "
Look up the term "legal fiction". That's all it is - it was expedient
to not have to invent a whole new classification of things and link it
to existing rights.
If atheism is a religion, then it is highly unique, it is the only one
with the correct answer:
"There is only the Universe, it has no supreme being/beings, it has no
creator/creators. The Universe is neither good nor evil, the Universe
is only indifferent."

Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
Gunner Asch
2012-01-04 04:25:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by W.T.S.
If atheism is a religion, then it is highly unique, it is the only one
ROFLMAO!

Prove its the correct answer.

Double dog dare you.


One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Richo
2012-02-22 04:10:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:29:36 +0000 (UTC), Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Benjamin Peroxide
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to start
was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a
supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said. "
Look up the term "legal fiction".  That's all it is - it was expedient
to not have to invent a whole new classification of things and link it
to existing rights.
Exactly - Scallops are "fish" - for the purposes of regulating the
fishing industry.
They don't magically stop being invertebrates of the class mollusca
just because the Law calls them "fish".


Mark.
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
2012-01-03 00:14:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.

--
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
"I am not real (and the burden is yours if you wish to prove
otherwise)."
Gunner Asch
2012-01-03 09:41:09 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:14:09 -0800 (PST), "Fidem Turbare, atheist
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.

Take it up with them. Btw kids..snipping out the quote from the court
doesnt make it go away.

Not even a good try to cover it up.

Gunner

One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Kenny McCormack
2012-01-03 13:33:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:14:09 -0800 (PST), "Fidem Turbare, atheist
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.
Take it up with them. Btw kids..snipping out the quote from the court
doesnt make it go away.
Not even a good try to cover it up.
The basic problem with your line is this. Suppose we divide the eternal
combatants in these newsgroups into these two groups:

1) Those who believe that religion is a Good Thing - a positive force in
society. Often referred to as "the faith-based community".

2) Those who believe that religion is a Bad Thing - a negative force in
society. Often referred to as "the reality-based community".

I assume from your postings that you are in Group 1 above. Correct me if I
am wrong about that.

Yet, you try to slag us by telling us that Atheism is a religion, assuming,
correctly, that we will take that as an insult. But the problem with that
is that you, being a Group 1'er, consider the concept of "religion" as a
positive thing. So, in your frame of reference, you are complimenting us.

I.e., you can't slag someone by calling them something which is positive and
good in your own frame of reference. It'd be like if *I* tried to insult
*you* by calling you a Democrat.
Post by Gunner Asch
One could not be a successful Rightwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Rightwingers, a goodly number of Rightwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
--
Windows 95 n. (Win-doze): A 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for
an 8 bit operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company
that can't stand 1 bit of competition.

Modern day upgrade --> Windows XP Professional x64: Windows is now a 64 bit
tweak of a 32 bit extension to a 16 bit user interface for an 8 bit
operating system based on a 4 bit architecture from a 2 bit company that
can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Gunner Asch
2012-01-04 04:27:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kenny McCormack
Post by Gunner Asch
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.
Take it up with them. Btw kids..snipping out the quote from the court
doesnt make it go away.
Not even a good try to cover it up.
The basic problem with your line is this. Suppose we divide the eternal
1) Those who believe that religion is a Good Thing - a positive force in
society. Often referred to as "the faith-based community".
2) Those who believe that religion is a Bad Thing - a negative force in
society. Often referred to as "the reality-based community".
Incorrect assumption from the start. That should be "often referred to
as the "faith-based Atheist community"

If its based on reality as you claim...please prove there are no god(s)

The rest of your argument fails at this point unless you can prove
your claims

(trash snipped)
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
Paul David Wright
2012-01-07 06:49:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
Post by Kenny McCormack
Post by Gunner Asch
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.
Take it up with them. Btw kids..snipping out the quote from the court
doesnt make it go away.
Not even a good try to cover it up.
The basic problem with your line is this. Suppose we divide the
1) Those who believe that religion is a Good Thing - a positive force in
society. Often referred to as "the faith-based community".
2) Those who believe that religion is a Bad Thing - a negative force in
society. Often referred to as "the reality-based community".
Incorrect assumption from the start. That should be "often referred
to as the "faith-based Atheist community"
The only one incorrect continues to be you, bigot.
--
PDW

Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Colanth
2012-01-03 22:11:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:14:09 -0800 (PST), "Fidem Turbare, atheist
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.
They never did, they invented the legal fiction that atheism is a
religion so as to NOT have to reinvent tons of established law.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
Hope Simmers
2012-01-04 00:16:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:14:09 -0800 (PST), "Fidem Turbare, atheist
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which the SCOTUS claims that it did.
I don't think this is correct. What case are you referring to?
Colanth
2012-01-03 15:56:10 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:14:09 -0800 (PST), "Fidem Turbare, atheist
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
It would require a whole new legal system if the court wished to give
lack of religion the same rights as religions. It was a whole lot
easier to invent the legal fiction that atheism is a religion, then
accord it the rights that the other religions already enjoyed.
--
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Nelson Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead.
Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." - George W. Bush
Richo
2012-02-22 05:49:37 UTC
Permalink
On Jan 3, 11:14 am, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which is fine - anyone can define anything anyway they like.
I will still be godless - in my terms.
I am godless - according to me.
All the Kings Horses and all the Kings Men cant change that.

Religious freedom means you get to believe (or not believe) how you
like and the law and the government don't get a say in it at all.

I am godless.
People can define, declare and make laws till the end of time - what
goes on in my own head is my own business.

The control freaks can just Fuck Right Off.

Mark.
Gunner Asch
2012-02-25 19:28:18 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:49:37 -0800 (PST), Richo
Post by Richo
On Jan 3, 11:14 am, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which is fine - anyone can define anything anyway they like.
I will still be godless - in my terms.
I am godless - according to me.
All the Kings Horses and all the Kings Men cant change that.
Religious freedom means you get to believe (or not believe) how you
like and the law and the government don't get a say in it at all.
I am godless.
People can define, declare and make laws till the end of time - what
goes on in my own head is my own business.
The control freaks can just Fuck Right Off.
Mark.
Like the atheists who demand all religious symbols be removed from
public buildings?
--
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
DanielSan
2012-02-26 01:22:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:49:37 -0800 (PST), Richo
On Jan 3, 11:14 am, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which is fine - anyone can define anything anyway they like.
I will still be godless - in my terms.
I am godless - according to me.
All the Kings Horses and all the Kings Men cant change that.
Religious freedom means you get to believe (or not believe) how you
like and the law and the government don't get a say in it at all.
I am godless.
People can define, declare and make laws till the end of time - what
goes on in my own head is my own business.
The control freaks can just Fuck Right Off.
Mark.
Like the atheists who demand all religious symbols be removed from
public buildings?
In accordance with the law? What about the theists who demand all
religious symbols be removed from public buildings?
pyotr filipivich
2012-02-26 05:42:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:49:37 -0800 (PST), Richo
Post by Richo
On Jan 3, 11:14 am, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which is fine - anyone can define anything anyway they like.
I will still be godless - in my terms.
I am godless - according to me.
All the Kings Horses and all the Kings Men cant change that.
Religious freedom means you get to believe (or not believe) how you
like and the law and the government don't get a say in it at all.
I am godless.
People can define, declare and make laws till the end of time - what
goes on in my own head is my own business.
The control freaks can just Fuck Right Off.
Mark.
Like the atheists who demand all religious symbols be removed from
public buildings?
Would that they would demand _all_ religious symbols.

They did get LA Country to remove the tiny cross which was on the
Mission building depicted on the County Seal. But the atheists didn't
really notice the pagan goddess Pomona on the same seal.
--
pyotr filipivich
Watergate didn’t have a body count. Gunwalker has hundreds.
Gunner Asch
2012-02-26 09:15:10 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:42:26 -0800, pyotr filipivich
Post by pyotr filipivich
Post by Gunner Asch
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:49:37 -0800 (PST), Richo
Post by Richo
On Jan 3, 11:14 am, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
Post by Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Post by Colanth
On 2 Jan 2012 17:59:16 -0000, "Mark Henderson"
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
The court ruled that atheism has the same legal protections that any
religion does, not that atheism *IS* a religion.
To claim that atheism is a religion would require a new definition.
Which is fine - anyone can define anything anyway they like.
I will still be godless - in my terms.
I am godless - according to me.
All the Kings Horses and all the Kings Men cant change that.
Religious freedom means you get to believe (or not believe) how you
like and the law and the government don't get a say in it at all.
I am godless.
People can define, declare and make laws till the end of time - what
goes on in my own head is my own business.
The control freaks can just Fuck Right Off.
Mark.
Like the atheists who demand all religious symbols be removed from
public buildings?
Would that they would demand _all_ religious symbols.
They did get LA Country to remove the tiny cross which was on the
Mission building depicted on the County Seal. But the atheists didn't
really notice the pagan goddess Pomona on the same seal.
True enough.
Post by pyotr filipivich
--
pyotr filipivich
Watergate didn’t have a body count. Gunwalker has hundreds.
'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith
becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact
equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man
because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the
person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...
There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American,
but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag,
the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the
English language.. and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a
loyalty to the American people.'
Theodore Ro osevelt 1907

Paul David Wright
2012-01-03 06:04:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Still NO, loser.
--
PDW

Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
SkyEyes
2012-01-03 22:18:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.

So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Greegor
2012-01-03 23:55:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things
I've found worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Aspergers is like that isn't it?
Yap
2012-01-04 01:58:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greegor
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things
I've found worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Aspergers is like that isn't it?
Massive autism sufferer talking of his experience....
Olrik
2012-01-04 04:21:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greegor
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things
I've found worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Aspergers is like that isn't it?
Is it?

BTW, where does your lack of humour, levity and intelligence comes from,
"Greegor"?
SkyEyes
2012-01-04 05:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greegor
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things
I've found worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Aspergers is like that isn't it?
I wouldn't know, Greegor, I'll bow to your expertise on that subject.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
2012-01-04 07:41:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greegor
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things
I've found worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Aspergers is like that isn't it?
Respect for family members and animals is fairly common among a wide
range of people, regardless of how they might be categorized based on
social, psychological, biological, neurological, or other such traits.

Classifying Aspergers as a disadvantage is a mistake because there
also advantages.

--
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
"Human behaviour flows from three main sources: Desire, Emotion, and
Knowledge."
-- Plato of Athens
BONNIE BITCH
2012-01-04 07:52:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Post by SkyEyes
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
SkyEyes
2012-01-04 08:26:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"?  And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Make me.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
BONNIE BITCH
2012-01-05 05:23:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by SkyEyes
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"?  And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Make me.
You looking for a man granny? I suspect that if you had as many dicks
sticking out of you as you've had stuck in you you'd look like a
porcupine.

STFU!
Post by SkyEyes
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Paul David Wright
2012-01-07 06:54:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"?  And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found
worth worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Make me.
You looking for a man granny? I suspect that if you had as many dicks
sticking out of you as you've had stuck in you you'd look like a
porcupine.
STFU!
Great example of Christian 'tolerance', asshole.
--
PDW

Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Kat
2012-02-18 07:10:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Make me.
You looking for a man granny?
It's stuff like the above that makes me think that you are in fact a
man. Not many women would say something so misogynistic. Not many sane
ones, anyways.
Post by BONNIE BITCH
I suspect that if you had as many dicks
sticking out of you as you've had stuck in you you'd look like a
porcupine.
Do you have Tourettes or are you just living up to your self appointed
bitch label?
Post by BONNIE BITCH
STFU!
NO U!
John Baker
2012-01-04 18:04:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
BONNIE BITCH
2012-01-05 05:26:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Colanth
2012-01-06 23:19:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
--
"The legislature's job is to write law. It's the executive branch's
job to interpret law." - George Bush
John Baker
2012-01-07 21:42:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
<PIGGYBACKING>
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
Got your boy swinging, Billy. Come get a taste.
Post by Colanth
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
2012-01-07 23:38:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"?  And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
<PIGGYBACKING>
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
Can we please leave the unicorns out of this? According to mythology,
they're smarter than we think and usually have a lot more class, and
to tarnish their image would surely be an injustice!
Post by John Baker
Got your boy swinging, Billy. Come get a taste.
That's what he said.  With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
I'm beginning to wonder if these religious right-wing-nuts may have
endured some very serious childhood trauma that has pushed them a few
steps and a screw loose beyond the usual "missing memory" symptoms.

--
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
"Every time a child says "I don't believe in fairies" there is a
little fairy somewhere that falls down dead."
-- Peter Pan
BONNIE BITCH
2012-01-10 20:17:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
Colanth
2012-01-11 13:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
Project much?
--
"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation.
But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have
been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made
them the most bloody religion that ever existed?" - John Adams
BONNIE BITCH
2012-01-12 06:24:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
Project much?
No, I KICK ASS A LOT THOUGH AS YOU HAVE EXPERIANCED.
(¯`·.ž Craig Chilton ž.·Ž¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
2012-01-12 08:54:37 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:24:55 -0500,
BIGOTED LOWLIFE, "Bill Taylor,"
No, I KICK ASS A LOT...
...of cockroaches. Your EQUIVALENT.

All lifeforms higher than that are superior to you.
Colanth
2012-01-12 15:58:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by Colanth
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by John Baker
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Blow me, you stupid Christer asshole.
Fuck you and the Pink Unicorn you rode in on, Johnny Boy.
That's what he said. With the same mouth you use to praise your god,
and the same mouth you use to curse with.
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
Project much?
No, I KICK ASS A LOT THOUGH AS YOU HAVE EXPERIANCED.
Never experienced you kicking my ass, but I have seen you lose it. All
the time. Must suck being you.
--
"The legislature's job is to write law. It's the executive branch's
job to interpret law." - George Bush
Kat
2012-02-18 07:11:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
Then why call someone a heathen as an insult, Bitch?
juanjo
2012-02-23 16:24:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
All you are is a sock puppet for some pathetic troll
BONNIE BITCH
2012-02-24 08:02:40 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:24:33 -0800 (PST), juanjo
Post by juanjo
Post by BONNIE BITCH
And you talk with the same mouth you suck dicks with and for your
information, cock sucker, I have never professed to being a follower
of any particular religion so shove your broad brush UP YOUR ASS!
All you are is a sock puppet for some pathetic troll
You wish, you cock sucker.
Paul David Wright
2012-01-07 06:53:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Who or what is "Marem Recti"? And who/whatever it is, no, I don't
"worship" it.
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
Thank you for the display of Christian 'tolerance', asshole.
--
PDW

Check out my blog:
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Kat
2012-02-18 07:07:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
Post by SkyEyes
So far in my 62 years on this earth, the only things I've found worth
worshiping are my Kid Brother, and cats.
Shut up, you old heathen bitch.
With people like you on this planet, it's no wonder she prefers the
company of cats.
Richo
2012-02-22 04:01:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
In Law scallops count as "fish". (even though they are clearly bivalve
mollusks.)

You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the Law
Corporations are persons.
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the law black
Africans are property.

So Mollusks are fish, corporations are "persons", Black people are
property of white and the moon is made of green cheese - if a court or
legislature declares it - if a court rules its so then it is so - for
the purposes of the law.

What about "in reality"?
Or isn't that of any concern to you?
Not everyone is interested in truth, I know - but some of us are.

Mark.
DanielSan
2012-02-22 04:03:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richo
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
In Law scallops count as "fish". (even though they are clearly bivalve
mollusks.)
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the Law
Corporations are persons.
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the law black
Africans are property.
So Mollusks are fish, corporations are "persons", Black people are
property of white and the moon is made of green cheese - if a court or
legislature declares it - if a court rules its so then it is so - for
the purposes of the law.
What about "in reality"?
Or isn't that of any concern to you?
Not everyone is interested in truth, I know - but some of us are.
Mark.
Meanwhile, what is "Marem Recti"?
Richo
2012-02-22 04:13:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by DanielSan
Post by Richo
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
In Law scallops count as "fish". (even though they are clearly bivalve
mollusks.)
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the Law
Corporations are persons.
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the law black
Africans are property.
So Mollusks are fish, corporations are "persons", Black people are
property of white and the moon is made of green cheese - if a court or
legislature declares it - if a court rules its so then it is so - for
the purposes of the law.
What about "in reality"?
Or isn't that of any concern to you?
Not everyone is interested in truth, I know - but some of us are.
Mark.
Meanwhile, what is "Marem Recti"?
I am uncertain, but I have a strong suspicion its something to do with
his obsession with ass sex.

Mark.
Bob LeChevalier
2012-02-23 12:04:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Richo
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
In Law scallops count as "fish". (even though they are clearly bivalve
mollusks.)
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the Law
Corporations are persons.
You could make a legal ruling that for the purposes of the law black
Africans are property.
So Mollusks are fish, corporations are "persons", Black people are
property of white and the moon is made of green cheese - if a court or
legislature declares it - if a court rules its so then it is so - for
the purposes of the law.
What about "in reality"?
Human language doesn't necessarily have anything to do with reality
(assuming that there is such a thing). Words mean what people use
them to mean. If you use a word differently than another person does,
then you obviously aren't communicating the same version of "reality".

The bottom line is that there are a variety of different definitions
of "atheist". None of them is more "correct" than any other in any
absolute reality sense. Some definitions will be accepted as
reasonable by more speakers of the language than others, and are
therefore more useful, but not any more "real".
Post by Richo
Or isn't that of any concern to you?
Not everyone is interested in truth, I know - but some of us are.
"Truth" has nothing to do with reality, and even less to do with
language as most people use it.

lojbab
---
Bob LeChevalier - artificial linguist; genealogist
***@lojban.org Lojban language www.lojban.org
juanjo
2012-02-23 16:31:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark Henderson
Kaufman v. McCaughtry, 419 F. 3d 678 - Court of Appeals, 7th
Circuit 2005
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10402140183334789701
&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Really ignorant trolls consistently engage in cherry picking quotes
from texts, whether religious, scientific or legal and then insisting
the quote supports their preconceived notion. The case cited above is
very specific:

We address his claim under the Free Exercise Clause first. An inmate
retains the right to exercise his religious beliefs in prison. Tarpley
v. Allen County, 312 F.3d 895, 898 (7th Cir.2002). The problem here
was that the prison officials did not treat atheism as a "religion,"
perhaps in keeping with Kaufman's own insistence that it is the
antithesis of religion. But whether atheism is a "religion" for First
Amendment purposes is a somewhat different question than whether its
adherents believe in a supreme being, or attend regular devotional
services, or have a sacred Scripture. The Supreme Court has said that
a religion, for purposes of the First Amendment, is distinct from a
"way of life," even if that way of life is inspired by philosophical
beliefs or other secular concerns. See Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S.
205, 215-16, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972). A religion need not
be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being (or beings,
for polytheistic faiths), see Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 495 &
n. 11, 81 S.Ct. 1680, 6 L.Ed.2d 982 (1961); Malnak v. Yogi, 592 F.2d
197, 200-15 (3d Cir.1979) (Adams, J., concurring); Theriault v.
Silber, 547 F.2d 1279, 1281 (5th Cir.1977) (per curiam), nor must it
be a mainstream faith, see Thomas v. Review Bd., 450 U.S. 707, 714,
101 S.Ct. 1425, 67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1981); Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d
1107, 1110 (7th Cir.2003).

Without venturing too far into the realm of the philosophical, we have
suggested in the past that when a person sincerely holds beliefs
dealing with issues of "ultimate concern" that for her occupy a "place
parallel to that filled by ... God in traditionally religious
persons," those beliefs represent her religion. Fleischfresser v.
682*682 Dirs. of Sch. Dist. 200, 15 F.3d 680, 688 n. 5 (7th Cir.1994)
(internal citation and quotation omitted); see also Welsh v. United
States, 398 U.S. 333, 340, 90 S.Ct. 1792, 26 L.Ed.2d 308 (1970);
United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 184-88, 85 S.Ct. 850, 13 L.Ed.
2d 733 (1965). We have already indicated that atheism may be
considered, in this specialized sense, a religion. See Reed v. Great
Lakes Cos., 330 F.3d 931, 934 (7th Cir.2003) ("If we think of religion
as taking a position on divinity, then atheism is indeed a form of
religion."). Kaufman claims that his atheist beliefs play a central
role in his life, and the defendants do not dispute that his beliefs
are deeply and sincerely held.

The Supreme Court has recognized atheism as equivalent to a "religion"
for purposes of the First Amendment on numerous occasions, most
recently in McCreary County, Ky. v. American Civil Liberties Union of
Ky., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2722, 162 L.Ed.2d 729 (2005). The
Establishment Clause itself says only that "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion," but the Court understands
the reference to religion to include what it often calls
"nonreligion."


Thus the court held that *** for purposes of the First Amendment *** a
person who is a professed atheist is considered as having a belief
system the equivalent to that of a religion which espouses a belief in
a deity.
BONNIE BITCH
2012-02-24 08:05:12 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:31:44 -0800 (PST), juanjo
Post by juanjo
Thus the court held that *** for purposes of the First Amendment *** a
person who is a professed atheist is considered as having a belief
system the equivalent to that of a religion which espouses a belief in
a deity.
So, you agree that atheism IS a religion. Good Boy!
Kat
2012-02-24 22:45:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by BONNIE BITCH
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:31:44 -0800 (PST), juanjo
Post by juanjo
Thus the court held that *** for purposes of the First Amendment *** a
person who is a professed atheist is considered as having a belief
system the equivalent to that of a religion which espouses a belief in
a deity.
So, you agree that atheism IS a religion.  Good Boy!
That's not what he said, Bitch. My goodness you are a manipulative
little troll.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...