On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:53:17 -0500, "Scout"
Post by Scout Post by deep
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
Post by Scout Post by deep
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
Post by Scout Post by deep Post by Scout
Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
wrong....you should do so as well?
That's the conservatives' mantra.
So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
science or math.
Talking to yourself again Dudu?
You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
you just don't know how stupid you are.
Standard Dudu Defense #1
Did voter fraud swing the election?
Exclusive: Joseph Farah presents evidence of illegal voting,
Contrary to popular opinion, I am not a conspiracy theorist.
I live in the real world always have. Ive been a journalist who
goes where the facts lead him all my life unlike most of my
colleagues whose facts are predetermined by their ideology.
Ads by Google
Man Cheats Credit Score1 simple trick & my credit score jumped 217
pts. Banks hate this! www.thecreditsolutionprogram.com
Utility InvestingTrade a Custom Portfolio of up to 30 Utility
Stocks - just $9.95. MotifInvesting.com/UtilityInvesting
I understand Barack Obama and Bill Ayers because I was one of them
early in my life. I even met Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and Tom Hayden
and Jane Fonda in the old days. I admired them. If Obama had been old
enough during the 1960s and 1970s, I probably would have run into him,
If anyone has a balanced approach to the realities of political life
in America, its me. Ive looked at life from both sides. I know the
arguments of the other side and can still spout them before most of
todays practitioners of so-called progressive thought can.
I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement represented so
ably today by Obama is this: By any means necessary
It was first
articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, Dirty Hands. But it
became popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.
What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means. It means
violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying,
stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie sins are
appropriate means of furthering the cause.
Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the reigning
ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?
There is no doubt in my mind.
And thats why stealing the vote is not only an acceptable practice by
these people, it is a moral imperative in their twisted worldview.
Am I suggesting that the recent presidential election was stolen
through voter fraud and manipulation?
Without a doubt.
Do I have evidence?
Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence to show that it was committed
by one side in the election in various ways. And I am convinced that
at least 5 percent of the Democratic vote can be attributed to fraud
illegal voters, illegal campaign contributions, rigged balloting,
intimidation at the polls, you name it.
Heres just some of the evidence for the skeptical:
In September, the Columbus Dispatch in Ohio reported this sad and
ugly news: More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is
probably ineligible to vote. In two counties, the number of registered
voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohios
Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while
in Lawrence County along the Ohio River its a mere 104 registered per
100 eligible. Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90
percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most
voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.
In a close presidential election where every vote might count, which
ones to count might become paramount on Election Day and in possible
legal battles afterward. The Dispatch asked Ohios chief elections
official, Secretary of State Jon Husted, what could be done about this
problem. His answer? Not enough. Nine months ago, he asked U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder for a personal meeting to discuss how to
balance seemingly conflicting federal laws so he could pare Ohios
dirty voter list without removing truly eligible voters. Holders
office never even bothered to reply to either Husted or the
newspaper. What does that tell you? It tells me voter fraud is and was
an important tactic in re-electing Holders boss and Democrats
throughout the country. Anyway, we all know how Ohio voted.
How about Michigan Romneys home state? How did Obama win such a
resounding victory when the polls showed the two candidates in a
virtual tie? And how is it that Obama won by 9 points while Democrats
suffered a string of defeats down the entire state ballot? For
instance, Republicans maintained control of both the state House and
the Supreme Court, while Democrats lost three ballot propositions.
Then, of course, there is the fine work of James OKeefe and
Project Veritas, which demonstrated, over and over again on camera,
the willingness and ability of Democratic operatives to cheat and
commit fraud to win elections.
How about WNDs own investigation in which it demonstrated
conclusively that the Obama campaign welcomed foreign contributions by
intentionally leaving vulnerabilities in its web donation page that
allowed even those using bogus names, disposable credit cards and
foreign IP addresses to donate cash? The classic example was when WND
staffers did just this using the name Osama bin Laden, listing his
occupation as deceased terrorist and employer as al-Qaida. The
contributions were accepted by the Team Obama, just as it accepted
foreign contributions from the Palestinian Authority in 2008, as WNDs
Aaron Klein demonstrated.
How much evidence does one need to be convinced? This is just the tip
of the iceberg.
Did it make a difference in this close race?
Is there anything we can do about it now?
But if we want to ensure that America has free and fair elections in
the future, we better get to work. Americas political system is
becoming a thugocracy.
Im fighting back.
And you can help me in this fight.
Im challenging the Obama campaign on the acceptance of those illegal
donations. Ive filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint at
considerable cost. I have no illusions that it will be easy to
challenge a sitting president within his own bureaucracy. But Im
doing it. Meanwhile, some in the press would prefer that I be charged
with voter fraud for efforts to expose the system. I wouldnt be a bit
surprised if the Democrat machine tries something like that.
Thats why we need your help.
Were fighting to preserve Americas freedom here nothing less.
Were fighting to preserve the concept of representative government
elections that actually mean something.
Were fighting to expose what no other news agency in the world
apparently has an interest in exposing the dark underbelly of
corruption, fraud and abuse in our political system.
""The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have
to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. Thats why I
became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you
have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to
use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats dont have
a clue as to political reality.
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard
workers and convince them that they should support social programs
that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a
little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you
The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic
operative instead of a Republican was because there were more
Democrats that didnt have a clue than there were Republicans."
James Carvell, DNC operative