Discussion:
Longtime White Supremacist to Serve on Penn. County GOP Committee
(too old to reply)
Ramon F Herrera
2012-07-05 16:03:49 UTC
Permalink
"Posted in Racist Skinheads by Leah Nelson on May 30, 2012 <<== See
the Date??

"Steve Smith, a longtime racist activist with a history of violence
and top-level ties to numerous white nationalist hate groups, has been
elected to a 4-year term on the Republican Party’s county committee
for Luzerne County, Penn., One People’s Project reports.

"Recruited into the neo-Nazi movement while he was stationed at Fort
Bragg in the 1990s, Smith, of Pittston, Penn., has been active in an
extraordinary array of white nationalist, skinhead, and neo-Nazi
groups, including American Third Position, Keystone United (formerly
Keystone State Skinheads), and the Council of Conservative Citizens.
He is a former Aryan Nations member and former leader of the
Philadelphia chapter of the National Association for the Advancement
of White People, which was created by former Klan leader David Duke
[...]"

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/05/30/longtime-white-supremacist-to-serve-on-penn-county-gop-committee/
http://tinyurl.com/6rkfg5l

-Ramon
Scout
2012-07-05 16:14:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ramon F Herrera
"Posted in Racist Skinheads by Leah Nelson on May 30, 2012 <<== See
the Date??
"Steve Smith, a longtime racist activist with a history of violence
and top-level ties to numerous white nationalist hate groups, has been
elected to a 4-year term on the Republican Party’s county committee
for Luzerne County, Penn., One People’s Project reports.
Posted in TPG by Scout on June 5, 2012 <<<==== See the Date?

Ex-KKK Grand Dragon, a Democrat, running for mayor of Lake Wales.

"In this small town of a little more than 13,000 people, times have changed
since the Jim Crow laws of segregation and Rogers isn't apologizing or
renouncing his time with the Klan"

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226285-US-Ex-KKK-Grand-Dragon-a-Democrat-running-for-mayor-of-Lakes-Wales
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
2012-07-05 17:51:44 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:14:32 -0400, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Ramon F Herrera
"Posted in Racist Skinheads by Leah Nelson on May 30, 2012 <<== See
the Date??
"Steve Smith, a longtime racist activist with a history of violence
and top-level ties to numerous white nationalist hate groups, has been
elected to a 4-year term on the Republican Party’s county committee
for Luzerne County, Penn., One People’s Project reports.
Posted in TPG by Scout on June 5, 2012 <<<==== See the Date?
Ex-KKK Grand Dragon, a Democrat, running for mayor of Lake Wales.
"In this small town of a little more than 13,000 people, times have changed
since the Jim Crow laws of segregation and Rogers isn't apologizing or
renouncing his time with the Klan"
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226285-US-Ex-KKK-Grand-Dragon-a-Democrat-running-for-mayor-of-Lakes-Wales
"Ex-"
Scout
2012-07-05 18:06:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:14:32 -0400, "Scout"
Post by Scout
Post by Ramon F Herrera
"Posted in Racist Skinheads by Leah Nelson on May 30, 2012 <<== See
the Date??
"Steve Smith, a longtime racist activist with a history of violence
and top-level ties to numerous white nationalist hate groups, has been
elected to a 4-year term on the Republican Party's county committee
for Luzerne County, Penn., One People's Project reports.
Posted in TPG by Scout on June 5, 2012 <<<==== See the Date?
Ex-KKK Grand Dragon, a Democrat, running for mayor of Lake Wales.
"In this small town of a little more than 13,000 people, times have changed
since the Jim Crow laws of segregation and Rogers isn't apologizing or
renouncing his time with the Klan"
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226285-US-Ex-KKK-Grand-Dragon-a-Democrat-running-for-mayor-of-Lakes-Wales
"Ex-"
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Ramon F. Herrera
2012-07-05 18:11:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.

Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.

-Ramon

---------------------------------

"Smith announced his election to the Luzerne County GOP committee six
days ago on news forum called White News Now. The news was greeted
with enthusiasm by members, one of whom commented, “This may seem like
just a small step now, but this is how we are taking our nation back
and it’s how we will secure a future for our people. Everyone needs to
look to Steve’s example. He’s a true patriot!”

As a committee member, he will have a say in the selection of the
Luzerne GOP’s County Chairman and Executive Committee, who, according
to the party’s website, “oversee and direct all of the activity of the
Republican Party in the County.” Luzerne County GOP officials did not
respond to a request for comment on Smith election in time for
publication."

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2012/05/30/longtime-white-supremacist-to-serve-on-penn-county-gop-committee/
Scout
2012-07-05 18:24:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.
Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.
He doesn't have to be elected....it's enough he's a KKK racist and a
Democrat.

You asked for CURRENT evidence, you've gotten it. Whether that person holds
elected office wasn't a condition of your assertion.

.....or is that you next goal post move?
George Plimpton
2012-07-05 18:29:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Expel him?
Ramon F Herrera
2012-07-05 19:10:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Plimpton
Expel him?
Can they do that? In Venezuela you can, because you register at the
respective party, in the same way that you become a member of a
professional association, club, etc. They fire disloyal people, with a
big announcement in the press. For instance, a very popular Chavista
mayor decided to run for Governor, against the party's wishes. He beat
the crap out of his contender (Chavez' buddy), humiliated the party
big shots and they had no choice but readmitting him.

When I emigrated to the US, I was surprised that at the time of
registering to vote, you declare yourself "as Democrat" or "as
Republican" or "as Independent". Same when you are running for office.

The guy below was running for Pinal County Sheriff before he decided
to kill 5, including a toddler and blew his brains.

-Ramon

----------------


Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.immigration,
alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.liberalism,
alt.society.liberalism
From: Ramon F Herrera <***@jonjay.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 21 2012 8:57 pm
Subject: You folks are NEVER going to guess what DEMOCRAT is running
for Sheriff in Arizona

Must be the heat...





J.T. Ready himself!! According to the press he is now FORMER Neo-Nazi,
running for Pinal County Sheriff as D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T.

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2012/01/neo-nazi_jt_ready_runs_for_pin.php
Klaus Schadenfreude
2012-07-06 00:12:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.
Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.
Don't worry, Ramon. The outline of Scout's boot print on your ass
should fade in a few weeks.



"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Ramon F. Herrera
2012-07-06 02:19:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.
Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.
Don't worry, Ramon. The outline of Scout's boot print on your ass
should fade in a few weeks.
"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
 ©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Really?

Well, in the category of hatred, your side wins by a very long
stretch.

Newsgroups: alt.politics
From: "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
<***@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2012 10:40 am
Subject: Looks like it's now open season on the two Obama nigletts/
future crack ho's.

-Ramon
Scout
2012-07-06 10:23:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.
Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.
Don't worry, Ramon. The outline of Scout's boot print on your ass
should fade in a few weeks.
"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Really?
Well, in the category of hatred, your side wins by a very long
stretch.
Newsgroups: alt.politics
From: "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2012 10:40 am
Subject: Looks like it's now open season on the two Obama nigletts/
future crack ho's.
I'll see your Robert Westergrom and raise you a Dudu

"Are you fucking kidding? Of course the nigger [Herman Cain] is lying."
-Deep Dudu
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Klaus Schadenfreude
2012-07-06 11:04:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Klaus Schadenfreude
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Post by Scout
Yep, which means he's not active in the Klan anymore, but you will note per
the quote produced that he is neither apologizing or renouncing his racist
views, and I tend to bet if he's a Democrat NOW, he was a Democrat THEN.
Things that the Democratic Party can do about it: NOTHING.
Let's see if he gets elected, and then you can bring him as example.
Don't worry, Ramon. The outline of Scout's boot print on your ass
should fade in a few weeks.
"Laugh laugh laugh laugh."
 ©Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
Really?
Maybe a bit longer if you say something stupid again.
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
Well, in the category of hatred, your side wins by a very long
stretch.
Newsgroups: alt.politics
From: "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 08:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2012 10:40 am
Subject: Looks like it's now open season on the two Obama nigletts/
future crack ho's.
If you say so.


"Mormons only care about their church. I know the Mormons. I learned
long ago "know your enemy". The
Mormons are our enemy."
- Deep Dudu, bigot
10/23/2011

"<yawn> Whatever. As long as someone kills all the Jews first."
6/2/2011

"The Jews are the only people in the world that have institutionalized
cheating and robbing anyone who is not Jewish."
6/2/2011

" Mormons lie worse than Jews."
1/9/2012

"I admit my error here. Nobody lies worse than Jews. Mormons are a
close second though."
1/24/2012

"Are you fucking kidding? Of course the nigger is lying."
-Deep Dudu
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"Our planet is nothing but a used up wasteland any more because of
white and Jewish greed."
- Mon, 21 May 2012

"Still waiting for you to prove I'm a bigot."
(by the way..I am. I just want to see you prove it)
-Lookout
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"The jews are liars. Period."
-Lookout
Post by Ramon F. Herrera
People talk about the holocaust frequently.
"But they have to be on the side of the jew lies about how many were
killed .. or they get fired."
-Einsatzgruppen Lookout
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Edward A. Falk
2012-07-06 00:08:09 UTC
Permalink
"Ex-"
Not good enough. Unless he's publicly repented, and cooperated with
law enforcement to bring down his former associates, or something
equivalent, he's unfit to hold public office IMHO.
--
-Ed Falk, ***@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
Gray Guest
2012-07-07 01:34:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Edward A. Falk
"Ex-"
Not good enough. Unless he's publicly repented, and cooperated with
law enforcement to bring down his former associates, or something
equivalent, he's unfit to hold public office IMHO.
Ya mean like Robert KKK Byrd did? Oh wait.
--
Refusenik #1
Topaz
2012-07-07 09:46:57 UTC
Permalink
THE ENEMIES of White people around the world have a pathological
love affair with the term 'White supremacist' whenever they report
on or describe White people who act in a collective manner, no
matter how benign, on behalf of their own group interests..
However, the same people who decry 'White supremacism' seem to have a
difficult time describing the actions of non-Whites acting on behalf
of their group interests, often violently, as supremacists of any
kind.
And never mind the fact that most so-called White supremacists
simply work to promote separate living space and political
independence from Jewish or other non-White influence.
All right then, I have a question for you about this 'White
supremacism': where is it? Where is this so-called White
supremacism? Have you seen it?

Far too many White people in America and around the world are
race-mixing and aborting themselves out of existence. Our
politicians are allowing record Third World immigration into our
White ancestral homelands. Our White corporate 'free traders' and
White globalists continue to impoverish us as they send our jobs
overseas, and our White politicians send our White soldiers to die
in a senseless war in Iraq for Israel, soldiers who will never sire
another generation of their own kind.

Does that sound like 'White supremacism'?
We continue to allow the media masters to produce their filth,
surpassing each other in obscenity as they abuse our people in print
and on screen. Does that sound like White supremacy?
Ubiquitous misinformation in the media and in the schools has made
too many of us ashamed of our nature and our traditions; our
accomplishments, we are told, belong to the entire world. Even most
Whites-who know they're being lied to-are still too scared to
organize for our common good, because Jewish supremacists such as
the Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, their
allies in the media, and their lapdog politicians attack any who
try to stand up to them; even as Jews and other non-Whites are
encouraged, even paid, to organize.

How "supreme" is that, my friends?
If you recall, the recent demonstrations of Mestizo invaders across
America bore a simple message: 'We claim your land! We claim your
jobs! We want your women! We demand your future! If you don't hand
us America, then you are racist pigs!'
Where was the massive so-called White supremacist backlash to these
invaders? Where was the White resistance to this clear and present
danger to our posterity? With the exception of the street activism
of National Vanguard members and supporters and a few other stalwart
patriots, I didn't see it. Did you?

So, where were all the White people during these Mestizo
demonstrations? Well, my guess is they were figuring out how they're
going to pay their next tax bill; working longer hours for less and
less inflation-reduced take-home pay; shopping at yet another new
Wal-Mart for the only kind of goods many can afford, Chinese junk;
watching ball games; attending yet another anti-White motion
picture, and so on. Some are blind, happily embracing their lives as
the new peons in a multiracial America, while others know something
is wrong, but haven't yet figured it out. Some know exactly what is
happening, but are afraid to say anything, falsely believing they
are all alone in their beliefs.
Fear is the dominant note in this funeral march.

Everywhere our borders have been opened and the
new elite teaches our children that intermarriage is good and
desirable. Everywhere the new elite teaches our children that to
defend our genetic heritage is the very definition of evil. The end
result, if trends continue, will be genocide.

There is no fortress against this persistent onslaught. There are no
mighty gates on the horizon swinging open to offer us sanctuary. The
Other is in every city, every county, every town, every hamlet now.
The Opponent continues to work overtime to convince us all that
White racial consciousness is "evil," because they know that we are
the only real obstacle to their malevolent plans for a global
plantation. They are the real supremacists. Not us.

History has set a task for us. It is to dispel the fog of fear that
immobilizes the sleeping White giant of our people. It is to change
the now-dominant note of fear to one of determination. It is to turn
that funeral march into a march of triumph.
National Vanguard. Our time has come and our time is now.

I'm Frank Roman. Thank you for listening and I shall speak with you
again.



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Klaus Schadenfreude
2012-07-07 11:50:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
And never mind the fact that most so-called White supremacists
simply work to promote separate living space and political
independence from Jewish or other non-White influence.
By advocating killing them and sending them to camps to extract the
gold from their teeth.....

[chuckle]
Topaz
2012-07-08 09:23:15 UTC
Permalink
The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder

'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.

Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
average man 'knows' the Holocaust exists because:

1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'

In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no
logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.
'Holocaust' is a loaded, dishonest term. You can't debate with
undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man
does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by
mass media, to disable his thinking so that he's worse positioned to
defend himself because he can't understand how he is manipulated to
accept the illogical. Debate in the mass media of a democracy is
nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms.

'Holocaust' is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at
the head of the West and the rest. Give them their money and their
pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will
notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to
deconstruct the Zionist Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the
designer label 'Holocaust.' Worship the Zionists and submit to their
demands - that is what the term Holocaust means.

A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history;
that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the
'Holocaust,' taking at face value the term's pretension to historical
designation, is the claim that six million Jews were murdered by Nazi
Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is
never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord
wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing
them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any
ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation
advanced. That Jews were gassed is treated as though it were already
proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the
practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to
smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all
know that Jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are
deniers driven by hate. But it ain't so just because "everybody knows"
it is.

We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.

There are men who can prove the 'Holocaust' is a Big Lie. You can find
them in jail. Their imprisonment is scarcely mentioned in the mass
media. Their imprisonment goes unlamented by the mass columnists. To
discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propa-sphere the
media construct. They must disappear. But we know, mass media. And
we're not going away. We're getting louder and stronger. And there's
nothing you can do to stop us.



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Klaus Schadenfreude
2012-07-08 12:44:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder
'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Here's a photo of that rich group

Loading Image...
Post by Topaz
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.
Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'
5) Because it's been verified by the US Military DURING and AFTER
the way
Post by Topaz
We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.
It's definitely not the worst thing to ever happen, but it's in the
Top Ten.

You can debate it all you like with no restrictions. That you IMAGINE
yourself to be restricted is a joke.
Topaz
2012-07-09 21:28:48 UTC
Permalink
by Theodore J. O'Keefe

Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.

US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.

For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.

What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.

A Different Reality

But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.

When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.

Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.

Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."

Typhus, Not Poison Gas

If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.

As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.

Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:

Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.

Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."

Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.

Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.

No 'Human Skin' Lampshades

What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.

The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.

It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.

While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."

Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:

The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.

Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."

Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."

'Gas Chambers'

In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)

Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.

Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.

Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)

Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."

Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."

The Propaganda Intensifies

More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.

Time for the Truth

It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.

Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.

Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.

Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:

1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.


Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659





http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-09 15:43:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder
'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.
Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization  crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'
In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no
logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.
'Holocaust' is a loaded, dishonest term. You can't debate with
undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man
does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by
mass media, to disable his thinking so that he's worse positioned to
defend himself because he can't understand how he is manipulated to
accept the illogical. Debate in the mass media of a democracy is
nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms.
'Holocaust' is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at
the head of the West and the rest. Give them their money and their
pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will
notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to
deconstruct the Zionist Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the
designer label 'Holocaust.' Worship the Zionists and submit to their
demands - that is what the term Holocaust means.
A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history;
that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the
'Holocaust,' taking at face value the term's pretension to historical
designation, is the claim that six million Jews were murdered by Nazi
Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is
never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord
wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing
them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any
ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation
advanced. That Jews were gassed is treated as though it were already
proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the
practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to
smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all
know that Jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are
deniers driven by hate. But it ain't so just because "everybody knows"
it is.
We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.
There are men who can prove the 'Holocaust' is a Big Lie. You can find
them in jail. Their imprisonment is scarcely mentioned in the mass
media. Their imprisonment goes unlamented by the mass columnists. To
discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propa-sphere the
media construct. They must disappear. But we know, mass media. And
we're not going away. We're getting louder and stronger. And there's
nothing you can do to stop us.
http://www.ihr.org/   http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The following article explains how a Holocaust happened.

How does a Holocaust happen?

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Herald
March 30, 1992

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5710/how-does-a-holocaust-happen

ONE DAY 16 OR 17 YEARS AGO, my father, who rarely blows up over
anything, lost his temper over a piece of bread.

It was lunchtime, and my siblings and I were goofing around at the
table. One of us, in play, threw a slice of bread at another. My
father exploded.

"What's the matter with you? That's food! Don't you ever let me see
you treat food like again!"

I remember being startled by his angry outburst. The words, however,
didn't really register. It wasn't until much later -- years later --
that I finally understood that flash of anger: To a man who has lived
through hunger, seen those around him die of starvation, nearly
starved to death himself -- to such a man, a piece of bread is not a
joke.

On Passover, which ended a few days ago, observant Jews do not eat
ordinary bread. Instead they eat matzo -- the dry, flat, unleavened
"bread of affliction" meant to remind them of their forebears'
deliverance from slavery in Egypt. At the ceremonial Passover meal,
they read aloud from the Haggadah, which tells the story of the
Exodus:

For in every single generation, they rise against us to annihilate
us.

In all the generations of Jewish history, never did "they" come as
close to succeeding as the Germans did in this very century, one brief
generation ago.

On the last day of Passover in 1944, the Nazis arrived in my father's
village of Legina -- a microscopic dot in the Slovak countryside, hard
by the border with Hungary. The knock on the Jakubovices' window came
on a Sunday morning before daybreak; like Legina's other Jews, they
were ordered to gather their things and be ready to leave in half an
hour's time. They were put on horse-drawn wagons and carried to
Satoraljaujhely ("Ujhely" for short), a large Hungarian town a few
miles away.

For six weeks, they stayed in Ujhely's Jewish ghetto, which grew
increasingly crowded as Jews from all over the region were brought in.

After a month, the transports began. A tenth of the ghetto's
population was removed at a time; my father and his family were taken
away in the third transport. On a Thursday, with only the belongings
they could carry by hand, they and 3,000 other Jews were marched
through the streets to the train station -- to the waiting boxcars. As
each car filled, its doors were chained and padlocked.

They were bound for a place called Auschwitz.

The train heading north into Poland, my father assumed, was taking him
and his family and the other Jews who'd been corralled into Ujhely to
a work site somewhere.

How could he have known otherwise?

How could he have guessed that he and all those boxcars crammed with
Jews were just a tiny fragment of the vast works that had been
constructed to annihilate the Jews of Europe? How could he have
understood that all over the continent, Jews by the millions were
being uprooted from their homelands -- lands, in some cases, where
Jews had dwelled for 900 years -- to be sent to special killing
grounds where all the science, industry, and manpower at Germany's
command would be pooled for purposes of quickly and efficiently
exterminating them? How could he have imagined that the world would
allow this horror to take place -- a horror so unprecedented that a
new word, genocide, had to be invented to contain it? How could he
have dreamed that in less than seven years, two out of every three
Jews in Europe would be a corpse, or the ashes of a corpse?

The train out of Ujhely moved for three days. It stopped early on a
Sunday morning, six weeks exactly since that knock on the window in
Legina. The doors were unchained. Suddenly there were screaming
guards, barking dogs, floodlights. The boxcar opened onto a ramp, at
the top of which a man with a crop in his hand waved people to the
right and to the left.

My grandparents, David and Leah Jakubovic, were waved to the right. So
were their 10-year-old son, Yrvin, and 8-year-old daughter, Alice.
They died in the gas chamber that day.

My father's teen-aged brother, Zoltan, was gassed a few days later.
His sister Franceska suffered horribly for a while; she died the
following spring.

Somehow my father survived Auschwitz, the death march to Mauthausen,
the camps at Melk and Ebensee. Somehow he survived the typhoid fever,
the unstoppable diarrhea, the starvation that reduced him -- at 19
years of age -- to 65 pounds.

I cannot explain the miracle of his survival, let alone the fact that
he can still laugh, and love. That was -- is -- God's doing.

But the Holocaust was man's. The Germans could get away with
systematically butchering 6 million Jews because good men and women,
through their indifference, let them get away with it.

For in every single generation generation, they rise against us to
annihilate us.

Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day, a part of the struggle against
indifference, a reminder that what could never happen has happened.

And can again.

For only one thing can stop a holocaust: memory. On this one day, at
least, let us remember the millions of innocents who died, and honor
the few who survived. But above all let us reflect, if only briefly,
that in the end nothing can shield us from the building of a new
Auschwitz except our undimmed rage at the old Auschwitz.

(Jeff Jacoby is the Boston Herald's chief editorial writer.)
Topaz
2012-07-09 21:29:37 UTC
Permalink
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber

Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.

Scholars challenge Holocaust story

Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.

The Auschwitz camps

The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.

The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.

Four million victims?

At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)

Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)

Bizarre tales

At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)

And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.

The Höss 'confession'

A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.

Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)

Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the Höss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.

The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence

Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.

Many Jewish inmates unable to work

For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.

But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)

This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)

These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.

The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)

Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)

Anne Frank

Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.

The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.

Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.

If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.

Allied propaganda

The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.

Allied planes dropped large numbers of LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)

Survivor testimony

Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.

An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.

Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)

Inmates released

Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)

Himmler orders death rate reduced

In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."

Furthermore, it ordered:

The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.

Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)

German camp regulations

Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)

New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.

Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.

The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.

Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.

Telltale aerial photos

Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims

Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)

Gassing expert refutes extermination story

America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.

Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.

In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.

He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)

Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)

www.ihr.org


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-09 23:08:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.
Scholars challenge Holocaust story
Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.
The Auschwitz camps
The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.
The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.
Four million victims?
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)
Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there.  Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz.  More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)
Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)
And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.
The Höss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.
Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)
Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the Höss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.
The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence
Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish inmates unable to work
For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)
These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)
Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)
Anne Frank
Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.
Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied propaganda
The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.
Allied planes dropped large numbers of  LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)
Survivor testimony
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.
Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)
Inmates released
Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)
Himmler orders death rate reduced
In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.
The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."
The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.
Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)
German camp regulations
Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)
New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.
Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.
The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.
Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.
Telltale aerial photos
Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)
Gassing expert refutes extermination story
America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.
Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.
In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)
Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)
www.ihr.org
http://www.ihr.org/   http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The following article is about how the Holocaust affected one
family.

The day the Nazis came for my father's family

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
April 7, 1994

http://tinyurl.com/7s8xjcg

FIFTY YEARS AGO this week, the Nazis came for my father's family.

The Jakubovics -- there were seven of them in the house -- were
awakened before dawn when the SS pounded on their window. Like the
other Jews in Legina, a village on the Czechoslovak-Hungarian border,
they were ordered to gather their belongings and prepare to leave at
once.

Thirty minutes later they were put on horse-drawn wagons and carted
out of Legina. In the nearest large Hungarian town, a place called
Satoraljaujhely, Jews from all over the region were being herded into
a ghetto. The walls were still going up around it as the Jakubovic
family arrived.

It was the day after Passover, the ancient Jewish festival celebrating
freedom and redemption.

For several weeks the ghetto grew increasingly crowded as more and
more Jews were brought in. Then it began to empty, as Jews were taken
out.

About 3,000 at a time, they were marched to the train station. The
waiting boxcars were filled with families. The doors were chained and
locked. There were no seats inside, no windows, no water. The only
toilet was a bucket on the floor.

For three days, the train moved -- three days of suffocation, thirst,
and filth. When it stopped, David and Leah Jakubovic and their five
youngest children, ages 21 to 8 -- Franceska, Markus, Zoltan, Yrvin,
and Alice -- were in Auschwitz.

* * *

A few years ago, I decided to chart a family tree.

I unrolled a great length of blank wrapping paper and began with my
father's four grandparents, the Weisses and the Jakubovics, writing
their names in the center. Those two couples had a total of 12
children, most of them born between 1880 and 1910. I was able to track
down the names of 11 -- two of them being David Jakubovic and Leah
Weiss, who married each other -- and inscribed them on the sheet.

I learned the names of spouses and filled them in. Then the names of
their children, and their children's spouses, and their children. I
traced the genealogy as best as I could through five generations,
handwriting names and dates on my big piece of wrapping paper.

It was more paper than I needed. This family tree has stumps where
branches ought to be. It gets narrower, not wider, as it grows. One
line after another stops abruptly, and all with a similar date
notation.

Alexander Weiss, wife Kati, son Tomasz -- d. 1942.

Regina Jakubovic, husband Herschel, five daughters -- d. 1944.

Gizella Weiss, husband surnamed Kraus -- d. 1944.

Freida Weiss, sons Robert, Laszlo, Mihaly -- d. 1944.

Leopold Weiss, wife Yolana, four children -- d. 1942.

I have no faces to put to these names, no stories to tell about them,
no remarks to attribute to them, no heirlooms to connect to them. All
I know is that they were my father's aunts, uncles, and cousins, and
like two out of every three Jews alive in Europe in 1938, they were
dead before 1946.

If I lose my piece of paper, there will be nothing to prove they ever
existed.

* * *

This is how my father, who with rare exceptions speaks about the
Holocaust only when he is asked, remembers his first day in Auschwitz:

"We arrived in Birkenau" -- part of the Auschwitz complex -- "on
Sunday morning. It was still dark, so it must have been before 5
o'clock. All of a sudden the train stops. The doors open. People
started shouting and dogs were barking. There were guards yelling
'Raus! Raus!' " -- 'Out! Out!'

"I remember going up the platform. We had to line up, men and women
separately, and go in front of Mengele. He had a little crop in his
hands and was waving, left, right, left, right. There were two or
three other guys, and they were pushing you, whichever way he pointed
with his crop.

"So my parents had to go to the right. Also my youngest brother and
sister; they were not much more than babies, small children. What it
meant -- left, right -- I didn't know. You just went where you were
pushed.

"I went in the other direction. I tried to stay together with my
brother Zoli. We had to get undressed, and they gave us the uniforms,
and tattooed us. And that was it. But within a few hours Zoli and I
were separated, and that was the last I ever heard of him.

"I guess they killed off my family that day, but I didn't know it
until later."

* * *

On his first day in the camp, Markus Jakubovic lost his parents and
four siblings. He would survive three more concentration camps before
liberation in May 1945. By the end he was disease-ridden, emaciated
from starvation, and close to death. He still remembers the crematoria
chimneys belching smoke day and night and the pits filled with
corpses.

He endured a forced march from Poland into Austria, when the Nazis
shot on the spot anyone who faltered or paused to rest. He saw Jews
hanged when they were caught trying to escape, their bodies left to
twist on the rope all day. He used to grab and swallow insects when he
saw them on the ground, so intense was his hunger.

But my father is shy about telling his story.

"I feel I had it not so bad as some of the others who suffered in the
camps," he says. "I did not go through hell like the others did. You
hear about infamous Auschwitz, the horrible stories. I did not have
any horrible stories."

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
Gunner Asch
2012-07-10 02:02:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
So Herr Oberst...where did 15,000.000 jews go between 1938 and 1945?

Grew wings and flew somewhere?

Gunner, who has been to the camps in Poland.....


--
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry
capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.
It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an
Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense
and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have
such a man for their? president.. Blaming the prince of the
fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of
fools that made him their prince".
Topaz
2012-07-10 21:02:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gunner Asch
So Herr Oberst...where did 15,000.000 jews go between 1938 and 1945?
Regardless of how you define a Jew, the statistics about the Jewish
world population are very contradictory and suspect from the very
beginning because the figures are more often than not furnished by the
Jewish organizations, which evidently have to respect the Holocaust
dogma according to which roughly one third of the Jews were
exterminated during World War Two. The leading pre-war expert on
Jewish population statistics, Arthur Ruppin, stated that there were
16.7 million Jews in the world in 1939 (13). For the immediate postwar
years, the World Almanac gave the following figures: 15.19 million in
1945 and 15.7 million in the following four years, from 1946 to
1949. But it its 1949 issue, the World Almanac quoted the figures
furnished by the American Jewish committee according to which there
had been 16.6 million Jews in 1939 and only 11.2 million in 1947 (14).
On the other hand, in an article published in the Jewish-owned New
York Times in early 1948, Hanson Baldwin, a military expert and
specialist on Palestine, stated that there were between 15 and 18
million Jews worldwide...

"In other words, "statistics" from Jewish organizations tend to
"prove" that 5 to 6 million died or disappeared during WWII (surprise
surprise), while those from more neutral sources show that the Jewish
world population remained about the same, or increased slightly, over
the war years."

Seneca
Post by Gunner Asch
Gunner, who has been to the camps in Poland.....
A Jewish Revisionist's Visit to Auschwitz
David Cole -- Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n2p11_Cole.html

The high point of my visit ... was my interview with Dr. Franciszek
Piper, Senior Curator of the Polish government's Auschwitz State
Museum... On tape, he admits that the so-called gas chamber in
Crematory Building (Krema) I, which is shown to half a million
visitors a year as a genuine homicidal gas chamber, is in fact a
reconstruction -- even down to the holes cut into the ceiling. Piper
also admits that walls were knocked down and bathroom facilities
removed. He went on to tell us that the remains of the "white
cottage," supposed site of the first preliminary gassings at Birkenau,
are also reconstructed. This was hardly news to me.

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=35&products_id=357
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.


http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Topaz
2012-07-10 21:00:07 UTC
Permalink
by James Buchanan

Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.

Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?

It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.

After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).

Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.

The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.

The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.

http://www.ihr.org

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-11 01:40:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later.  If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org
http://www.ihr.org/   http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The following article is about seeking justice for the crimes of
the past.

Seeking justice for crimes of the past

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
September 27, 1994

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/3042/seeking-justice-for-crimes-of-the-past

LAST WEDNESDAY, exactly one year from the day that John (Ivan)
Demjanjuk was released from an Israeli prison and allowed to return to
the United States, the Justice Department moved to revoke the
citizenship of Aleksandras Lileikis, an elderly Lithuanian immigrant
who lives in Norwood, Mass. Perhaps the timing was a hint that the
government will not let the outcome of the Demjanjuk case -- in which
an indisputably guilty war criminal was set free on a technicality --
derail its efforts to root out Nazi collaborators living in America.

Like Demjanjuk, a Ukrainian, Lileikis is charged with having been one
of the legion of East Europeans who willingly joined the Nazis in
effecting the Final Solution, then immigrated to the United States
under fraudulent pretenses. Unlike Demjanjuk, an ignorant peasant
trained by the Nazis to kill Jews at the Sobibor and Treblinka death
camps, Lileikis was an officer and an intellectual, with power and
prestige and scores of men at his command. The Demjanjuk prosecution
turned on the testimony of aging eyewitnesses and evidence supplied by
the KGB, but the case against the Lithuanian rests on a solid paper
trail, with every damning document is signed by Lileikis himself.

A university graduate who earned a law degree and speaks several
languages, Lileikis made his mark in the Lithuanian secret police --
the "Saugumas." By 1939, he was chief of the Saugumas in Vilna,
Lithuania's largest city. When the Soviet Union occupied the Baltic
States in 1940, Lileikis ran away to Nazi Germany. He returned to his
homeland after Germany invaded Lithuania in June of 1941, and was
reinstalled by the Nazis in his former position.

The Saugumas was a major component of the Nazi killing operation in
Lithuania, which began immediately following the invasion. The Germans
relied on Lileikis and his officers to round up Jews and transport
them to the Ponary Woods, a forest about six miles outside Vilna.
There, they were stripped, robbed of their belongings, lined up 10 or
20 at a time at the edge of deep pits, and shot.

Jewish victims of mass murder in the Ponary Woods near Vilna,
Lithuania

The killing was done by death squads called "Einsatzgruppen." The term
is German. But the killers at the Ponary pits were largely Lithuanian.

For Lithuanians had welcomed the Nazi invasion, greeting the Germans
with flowers and cheers. Many Lithuanians (like many Poles, Latvians,
and Ukrainians) were anti-Semitic to the core, only too glad to
participate in killing their Jewish neighbors. With the collaboration
of the Saugumas and the Lithuanians who volunteered to commit mass
murder at places like Ponary, the Nazis, in just three years, were
able to exterminate 96 percent of Lithuanian Jewry.

Before the war, Vilna was a vibrant center of Jewish learning,
culture, and literature, so renowned that it was nicknamed "the
Jerusalem of Lithuania." Some 80,000 Jews lived in Vilna when the
Nazis entered. By the time they departed, the Jerusalem of Lithuania
was virtually Jew-free.

History books and Nazi records are replete with statistics: 5,000
Vilna Jews massacred at Ponary in the first 12 days of the German
occupation; 35,000 in the first two months; 48,000 by the end of 1941.

Dr. Jacob Wigodsky was one of these statistics. A former member of the
Polish Senate, a longtime leader of Vilna's Jewish community, he was
arrested by the Saugumas, presumably at Lileikis' command, and shot at
Ponary on Aug. 31, 1941. He was 86 years old, killed for the crime of
being a Jew. Lileikis is 87.

Abba Kovner, a Vilna resident who survived the war, described two more
of these statistics at the Eichmann trial in 1961:

"At midnight, I saw from the other side of the street, it was 39
Ostrashun Street, a woman was dragged by the hair by two soldiers -- a
woman who was holding something in her arms. One of them directed a
beam of light into her face; the other one dragged her by her hair and
threw her on the pavement.

"Then the infant fell out of her arms. One of the two, the one with
the flashlight, I believe, took the infant, raised him into the air,
grabbed him by the leg. The woman crawled on the earth, took hold of
his boot, and pleaded for mercy. But the soldier took the boy and hit
him with his head against the wall -- once, twice, smashed him against
the wall."

On Aug. 31, 1941, alone, according to the Nazis' meticulous
bookkeeping, precisely 2,019 Jewish women, 864 men, and 817 children
were shot at Ponary.

It is difficult, 50 years on, to see faces or recall names in these
statistics. Far easier to see Lileikis' face -- to see the extremely
old man he has become, with little left in this world but his thick
glasses, his ailing wife, and his dilapidated house on Sumner Street.
Why pursue him? Why dig up papers he signed long ago -- citing musty
statistics, disturbing his peace - when the end of his life is so
near?

Why? Because a man remains accountable for his life even at the end of
his life. Because civilization depends on reinforcing the idea of
justice, even when justice itself can no longer be meted out. Because
only by keeping open the window of memory can we protect ourselves
against the hells of our past.

If the Justice Department is correct, the man who helped turn
thousands of men, women, and children into statistics entered the
United States in 1955 and became an American citizen in 1976. The
crimes he abetted in Vilna cannot be undone. But his presence in this
country is one abomination that can still be reversed.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
Topaz
2012-07-11 16:08:52 UTC
Permalink
Auschwitz Museum Director
Reveals 'Gas Chamber' Hoax
By P. Samuel Foner
The Spotlight
Volume XIX, Number 2
5-31-4

In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek
Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State
Museum admitted on camera that 'Krema 1,' the alleged 'homicidal gas
chamber' shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at
the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the
Soviet Union -apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.

What Piper said - in effect and on camera - was that the explosive
1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in
the buildings designated as 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz.

With this admission by none other than the respected head of the
Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred 'facts' of history has
been destroyed. This 'gas chamber' is the major historical 'fact' on
which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western nations
since WWII are based.

It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United States
has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in 1948 -
amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the Jewish
state and billions more paid by Germany in 'reparations' - not to
mention the constructing of Israel's national telephone, electrical
and rail systems...all gifts of the German people. It is the basis for
the $10 billion 'loan' (read 'gift') made to Israel for housing its
immigrants in the occupied territories...while Americans sleep on the
streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands. (Note - As of
2004, not a single 'loan' of US tax money made to the state of Israel
by Washington has ever been paid back. -ed)

Germany is paying 'reparations' - the United States is making
major contributions - to atone for the 'gassings at Auschwitz' and
elsewhere. If the 'homicidal gas chambers' were postwar creations of
the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed,
color or country of national origin, then these 'reparations' were
unnecessary, and were based on fraud.

The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in
mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12
years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists
and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really
happened at Auschwitz.

Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the
'irrefutable fact' that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at
Auschwitz. The number of those executed - also declared irrefutable -
was 4.1 million.

Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an
official 're-evaluation' of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to 1.1
million). As a budding historian - and a Jew - Cole was intrigued.

Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the
official 4.1 millon 'gassing' deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an anti-
semite, neo-nazi skinhead at the very least. Quietly, because of
revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.1 million.
No mention was made of the missing 3 million.

The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the
Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating 'proofs' of
homicidal gassings. Keep in mind that over the years millions of
tourists have been told that 'Krema 1' is in its original state, while
officials knew that 'original state' is a lie.

The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of
this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be
measured. Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with
Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have
taught about the Auschwitz gas chamber since WWII is a lie. It proves
that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have
been telling their flocks is simply not true.

No one, regardless of race, creed, color or country of national origin
was gassed to death in any building so designated at Auschwitz. And
without 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz, where is the reasoning
for the special treatment of the state of Israel?

Note - This is excerpted from the orginal, much longer article by P.
Samuel Foner.



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-12 00:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
Auschwitz Museum Director
Reveals 'Gas Chamber' Hoax
By P. Samuel Foner
The Spotlight
Volume XIX, Number 2
5-31-4
In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek
Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State
Museum admitted on camera that 'Krema 1,' the alleged 'homicidal gas
chamber' shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at
the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the
Soviet Union -apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.
What Piper said - in effect and on camera - was that the explosive
1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in
the buildings designated as 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz.
With this admission by none other than the respected head of the
Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred 'facts' of history has
been destroyed. This 'gas chamber' is the major historical 'fact' on
which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western nations
since WWII are based.
It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United States
has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in 1948 -
amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the Jewish
state and billions more paid by Germany in 'reparations' - not to
mention the constructing of Israel's national telephone, electrical
and rail systems...all gifts of the German people. It is the basis for
the $10 billion 'loan' (read 'gift') made to Israel for housing its
immigrants in the occupied territories...while Americans sleep on the
streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands. (Note - As of
2004, not a single 'loan' of US tax money made to the state of Israel
by Washington has ever been paid back. -ed)
Germany is paying 'reparations' -  the United States is making
major contributions - to atone for the 'gassings at Auschwitz' and
elsewhere. If the 'homicidal gas chambers' were postwar creations of
the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed,
color or country of national origin, then these 'reparations' were
unnecessary, and were based on fraud.
The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in
mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12
years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists
and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really
happened at Auschwitz.
Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the
'irrefutable fact' that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at
Auschwitz. The number of those executed - also declared irrefutable -
was 4.1 million.
Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an
official 're-evaluation' of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to 1.1
million). As a budding historian - and a Jew - Cole was intrigued.
Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the
official 4.1 millon 'gassing' deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an anti-
semite, neo-nazi skinhead at the very least. Quietly, because of
revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.1 million.
No mention was made of the missing 3 million.
The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the
Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating 'proofs' of
homicidal gassings. Keep in mind that over the years millions of
tourists have been told that 'Krema 1' is in its original state, while
officials knew that 'original state' is a lie.
The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of
this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be
measured. Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with
Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have
taught about the Auschwitz gas chamber since WWII is a lie. It proves
that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have
been telling their flocks is simply not true.
No one, regardless of race, creed, color or country of national origin
was gassed to death in any building so designated at Auschwitz. And
without 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz, where is the reasoning
for the special treatment of the state of Israel?
Note - This is excerpted from the orginal, much longer article by P.
Samuel Foner.
http://www.ihr.org/   http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
The Holocaust was suspended, nithing.

For some people, it did not end.

A suspension of barbarity

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
April 27, 1995

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4096/a-suspension-of-barbarity

FIFTY YEARS AGO, they keep saying. Fifty years ago, Auschwitz was
liberated. Fifty years ago, the Nazis were defeated. Fifty years ago,
the survivors emerged from the ash and bones and hell of the death
camps. Fifty years ago, the world, sickened to discover how
unspeakably deep and black was the abyss into which one of the most
cultured nations on earth had systematically ground up 6 million Jews,
swore: Never again. Fifty years ago, the Holocaust ended.

Fifty years ago.

Ended?

In the Cleveland synagogue I grew up in, there was a woman named
Esther, a survivor of the camps. Over the years I watched her mind
slowly disassemble, pulled apart by memories too violent to endure.
She would burst into shouts during the rabbi's sermon and madly rush
to kiss the Torah scroll as it was carried to the ark. When charity
appeals were made from the pulpit, she would wave in the air, of all
things, Czechoslovak stamps, crying out that she had something of
great value to donate. I got hold of one of those stamps once and
looked it up in a catalog. It was worthless.

When, exactly, did the Holocaust end for Esther?

In the same synagogue was a man called B--, an envelope maker who had
no children and who we all somehow knew never would. What B-- lost in
the camps wasn't his life, but something even more precious: all hope
of giving life. During the war, he had been sterilized in one of Dr.
Mengele's sadistic experiments.

When did his Holocaust end?

When did my father's?

On May 7, 1945, the concentration camp at Ebensee, an Austrian town
between Linz and Salzburg, was abandoned by its Nazi guards. Among the
Jews not yet dead in that place was my father. He was 19 years old, he
weighed 65 pounds, and he was nearly gone with starvation and typhoid
fever. Thirteen months and three camps earlier, on his first day in
Auschwitz, he had seen his parents sent to the gas chamber, along with
his 10-year-old brother Yrvin and his little sister Alice, who was 8.
My father's teen-age brother Zoltan was murdered a few days later; his
older sister Franceska by the following spring.

When the Nazis fled Ebensee on that May morning 50 years ago, my
father was left with nothing but the rags he was wearing and a
greenish-blue tattoo on his arm: A-10502.

And feelings of guilt that have lasted for decades.

"I had dreams and nightmares about what happened," he said to me once.
"I always feel sort of guilty, even until now, about not protecting my
younger brother. I was with him together for a just a few hours; then
we were separated. I wonder -- could I have insisted that he stay with
me? I don't know. Coming from a farm, I was naive. I was not
sophisticated."

Between 1940 and 1945, it was a central aim of the German Reich to
exterminate every Jew in Europe -- to bring about, once and for all, a
"Final Solution" to the Jewish "problem." To carry out this policy,
which was given a higher priority than even the war effort, the Nazis
constructed a vast and elaborate machinery, employing tens of
thousands of people and requiring the most detailed and complicated
logistics. It was an industry whose raw material was Jews, which it
imported from lands as far-flung as Greece and Norway, and whose final
product was Jewish corpses, or the greasy smoke of Jewish corpses. To
ensure its success, the Nazis drew on all the resources of wealth,
science, engineering, transportation and manpower at their command.

And my father has felt guilty for 50 years because he didn't know how
to save his brother.

Has his Holocaust ended?

I mistrust this number, this 50. It seems too definitive a milestone,
too complete, too over-and-done-with. When I hear the words "ended 50
years ago," it seems to me I also hear: "Enough already." "Let it go."
"It's history."

Is it?

On an NPR broadcast two weeks ago, an articulate skinhead named Tracy
Gilson was asked why he has Hitler's face tattooed on his neck.

"The Holocaust," replied the young man, who became a skinhead at 13.
"You know what? If it did happen, good. I don't care. I'm glad. I
really -- that's good. That's great. Swell, good. Kill 6 million more,
somebody, please. . . . I wish somebody would do that here, freakin'
decide that they need to get rid of all the trash and start building
death camps. That would be fine with me."

The Holocaust didn't end 50 years ago; it was only suspended. What
separates us from 8-year-old girls gulping death in gas chambers is
nothing more than a thin veneer of civilization, stretched like a
bandage over a bleeding wound, capable of being stripped away in a
twinkling. Germany is the land of Bach and Durer and Goethe, after
all. Yet how readily it became the land of Buchenwald and crematoria
and pits filled with naked, machine-gunned Jews.

There is nothing so evil, so demonic, that people cannot be induced to
do it, or to look the other way while it is being done. Not only storm
troops and skinheads. Nice people. Cultured people. People like us.

Fifty years ago, the Holocaust was suspended. How long it stays
suspended depends on how long we remember to never forget. Fifty years
after the spring of 1945, when even those who survived are almost all
gone and wildflowers grow where dead parents and dead children were
once piled high, we need to remember more urgently than ever.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe).
Topaz
2012-07-13 01:04:53 UTC
Permalink
By Faurisson

The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Zündel Trial (1985)

The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Zündel trial in
Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
importance of the second Zündel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.

In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
Zündel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
before, during and after execution).

On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
issue of their existence].[6]

At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspräsident.
During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
"Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
"Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.

The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
made difficulties for a witness like Filip Müller, not one asked of a
Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
gas chamber.

And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
and when.

Fortunately for me, Ernst Zündel accepted my conditions and Douglas
Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
counting on Ernst Zündel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
historical prominence.

From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
responses.

The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
a new trial against Ernst Zündel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
did there exist witnesses of the crime?

A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.

Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba

For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
telling him now!

Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:

"Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).

,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!

In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
question:

"You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).

The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:

"I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).

Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
witnesses.

The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses

Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.

Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
Jacques Vergès, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Vergès. If
this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
the gas chambers.

All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
testified before the court as to having seen one or having
participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
chambers'.

Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
inevitably they retorted:

"How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
gassed also."

This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
think…

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-14 00:59:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
By Faurisson
 The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Zündel Trial (1985)
The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Zündel trial in
Toronto.
The following article describes the crime of one of the
perpetrators of the Holocaust.

The terrible crimes of Ivan

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
September 28, 1995

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5609/the-terrible-crimes-of-ivan

IT WAS two years ago this week that John (Ivan) Demjanjuk flew back to
Cleveland, Ohio. His return came 12 years after he had been stripped
of his US citizenship for lying about his past as a Nazi collaborator;
six years after he had been extradited to Israel to stand trial for
murder; five years after he was convicted by an Israeli court of
committing "cruel and torturous acts" in the Treblinka death camp; and
two months after he was set free on a technicality by the Israeli
Supreme Court.

Demjanjuk's presence in this country is obscene. He was an accessory
to the most awful evil of the 20th century; the blood of unnumbered
victims stains his hands. He entered America in the first place under
false and illegal pretenses. His re-entry two Septembers ago was a
travesty, one that only grows more rancid with the passage of time.

To this day, Demjanjuk's partisans protest that he was the victim; the
real travesty, they say, was that a harmless man should have been put
through such an ordeal. Pat Buchanan -- a ready defender of exposed
Nazi criminals -- has labeled Demjanjuk a modern "Dreyfus" and
compared him to the martyrs hanged by "the Salem judges."

A more deliberate perversion of history is hard to imagine. Dreyfus
and the Salem "witches" were innocent, blamed for crimes they never
committed. Demjanjuk's guilt, by contrast, is undeniable, and the
evidence of his enormities overwhelming.

Like many other Ukrainians, Demjanjuk was glad to help the Nazis
massacre Jews. In 1942, he volunteered to be a wachmann, a member of
the extermination crews the Nazis set up in Poland and the Soviet
Union. He was sent for training to the Trawniki concentration camp,
where he took an oath of loyalty to the SS, and received its official
tattoo. Like the other wachmanner trained at Trawniki, Demjanjuk
mastered -- in the words of Israel's high court -- "every stage of the
extermination process," from rounding up Jews in ghettoes to pumping
carbon monoxide into gas chambers.

Demjanjuk's Nazi-issued ID card
In Trawniki, Demjanjuk was issued ID card No.1393. The 5-by-7-inch ID,
complete with photo and official stamps, still exists. It establishes
beyond any whisper of doubt that Demjanjuk was a Nazi-trained
accomplice to genocide. Though his lawyers loudly proclaimed the
document a forgery, its authenticity was tested and confirmed by every
court that heard the case.

On March 27, 1943, Demjanjuk was posted to the Sobibor death camp, one
of three erected by the Germans to carry out "Operation Reinhard" --
the liquidation of the Jews of Poland and the eastern lands. Between
March 1942 and October 1943, some 2,250,000 human beings were gassed
to death in these camps. Most of the killing was committed by non-
German collaborators, especially Lithuanians, Latvians -- and
Ukrainians like Demjanjuk.

At some point in 1943, Demjanjuk was transferred to Treblinka. So
infamous was his sadism there that he was nicknamed "Ivan Grozhny" --
Ivan the Terrible. Forty years later, survivors of Treblinka
remembered him vividly. Seven Jewish eyewitnesses, some of them
trembling and weeping, identified Demjanjuk as Ivan the Terrible, and
testified in court to his brutalities. He would stab Jews as they were
herded to the gas chambers; he would slice off noses and ears with a
saber; he would cut women between their legs; he would lash victims
with a whip.

"One day he ordered a prisoner to lie face down on the ground
and . . . took a tool for drilling wood and drilled a hole into the
prisoner's buttocks," a survivor testified. Another recalled: "Ivan
split one head after another. I heard screams, crying. There were no
words to describe it."

The eyewitnesses' words were transfixing. The evidence of Demjanjuk's
crimes overwhelmed the defense. The Israeli Supreme Court found the
testimony -- which was given under oath and subjected to cross-
examination -- "effective corroboration," "reliable," and
"convincing." What led the justices to vacate Demjanjuk's sentence was
no weakness in the powerful and unimpeached evidence against him.

After the trial had ended, a batch of old depositions found in KGB
files in Kiev -- statements made by long-dead guards at Treblinka --
suddenly materialized. No one knows who took these depositions, under
what circumstances they were taken, or even what questions were asked.
But in several of the statements a wachmann named Ivan Marchenko --
not Demjanjuk -- is mentioned as the gas chamber operator at
Treblinka. Of course the statements might be false or mistaken. Or
Marchenko and Demjanjuk might have been gas chamber operators at
different times. Or the depositions could be phony.

"We do not know how these statements came into the world and who gave
birth to them," the justices wrote. By normal standards of evidence,
they should have been deemed worthless and inadmissible.

But unwilling to convict even a sadistic Nazi wachmann unless every
detail of the case against him were perfect, the court let him go.

Justice miscarried. But there is no debating Demjanjuk's unspeakable
past, and he has no business being on American soil. There is only one
place where Demjanjuk belongs. He's 75; with any luck, he'll be there
soon.
Topaz
2012-07-14 09:25:47 UTC
Permalink
by James Buchanan

Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.

Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?

It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.

After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).

Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.

The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.

The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.

http://www.ihr.org

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
John B.
2012-07-14 11:07:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
Must have been a bunch of very dumb Jews given that the U.S. entered
WW I in April of 1917 and the Balfour Declaration was dated November
1917.

Or perhaps more simply a really, really, stupid poster like the O.P.

Cheers,
John B.
Topaz
2012-07-15 10:16:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by John B.
Post by Topaz
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
Must have been a bunch of very dumb Jews given that the U.S. entered
WW I in April of 1917 and the Balfour Declaration was dated November
1917.
Germany and the Jews
The Role of the Jews in WWI and WWII

Speech By: Benjamin H. Freedman

1961
Introductory Note:
Benjamin H. Freedman was born of Jewish parents in 1890. He became a
successful businessman in New York City, and was at one time the
principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. He broke with organized
Jewry after World War II, and spent the remainder of his life and at
least 2.5 million dollars publicizing the facts of Jewish influence on
the United States. Mr. Freedman knew. He had been an insider at the
highest levels of Jewish organizations, and was personally acquainted
with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin
Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more of the
movers and shakers of his time.

This speech was given in 1961 at the Willard Hotel in Washington,
D.C., on behalf of a newspaper of that time, Common Sense.
Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have
complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too
complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their co-
religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute
monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad
statement, but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep.
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are
few people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on
one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side
by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.

Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally,
but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to
the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great
Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one
week's food supply -- and after that, starvation. At that time, the
French army had mutinied. They had lost 600,000 of the flower of
French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army
was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they
didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the
Italian army had collapsed.

Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had
crossed the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England
peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the
lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war
off, and let everything be as it was before the war started." England,
in the summer of 1916 was considering that -- seriously. They had no
choice. It was either accepting this negotiated peace that Germany was
magnanimously offering them, or going on with the war and being
totally defeated.

While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the
Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I
am going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the
documents to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here.
You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to
accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win
this war if the United States will come in as your ally." The United
States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young;
we were rich; we were powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee
to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with
you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the
war." In other words, they made this deal: "We will get the United
States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay is Palestine
after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and
Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to
anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland
for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain,
that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is
known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the
Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they
did make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I
don't know how many here remember it - - the United States, which was
almost totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally.

I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the
newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all
the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by
Jews; and they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German
because many of them had come from Germany, and also they wanted to
see Germany lick the Czar. The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they
didn't want Russia to win this war. These German-Jew bankers, like
Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused
to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood
aside and they said: "As long as France and England are tied up with
Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, they fought
beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.
Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting
Palestine, went to England and they made this deal. At that time,
everything changed, like a traffic light that changes from red to
green. Where the newspapers had been all pro-German, where they'd been
telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having
fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, all of a
sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns.
They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies'
hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war
on Germany.

The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to
Justice Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're
getting from England what we want. Now you go to work on President
Wilson and get the United States into the war." That's how the United
States got into the war. We had no more interest in it; we had no more
right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in
this room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our
war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered
into -- that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain
Palestine. That is something that the people of the United States have
never been told. They never knew why we went into World War I.
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they
said: "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have
something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your
bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know
whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they
started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter,
which was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large
wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour
Declaration.

The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the
Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the
United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that
you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I
don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.

That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the
war. The United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When
the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace
Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought
to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when
they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these
nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory,
said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first
time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the
Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game!
That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the
first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the
terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists
wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans
realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews
had never been better off in any country in the world than they had
been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times
as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this
country. You had Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the
North German Lloyd's and the Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr.
Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern family. You had
the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the
biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No
question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a
sellout."

It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical
situation: Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union.
And we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit.
We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a
sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And
throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing
defeat, with reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot
encompass. Imagine, then, after that defeat, if we found out that it
was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the
time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were selling
us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China
was brought into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the
United States against Chinese? I don't think that one of them would
dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough convenient
lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.

Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so
nice to them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in
Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all
went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated
very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no
reason at all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a
so-called "Jewish commonwealth."

Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you
read about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921,
1922, and 1923 wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled
with their statements -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany
is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was
brought about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States
into the war. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the
Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better
than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious feeling.
There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their
religious belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was
anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went
home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema' Yisroel" or "Our
Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in the United
States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to
one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing
defeat.

And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for
which Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of
being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade.
You must remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution
consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so
forth. Three hundred separate little political entities. And between
that time, between the times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were
consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they became one of
the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's,
they were doing business all over the world, they could under sell
anybody, they could make better products. What happened as a result of
that?

There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap
down Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a
valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the
map politically.

When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat,
they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was
harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown
University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State
Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department
document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to
Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political
prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.
They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they
were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because
the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists in
Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers,
and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international
affiliations.

Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over
Bavaria for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group
of other Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when
the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the
Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that
he was going to meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland
for safety, for security. After the Communist threat in Germany was
quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back into their
former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could
without hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the
same way that, in this country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who
was interested in liquor. They didn't fight one another with pistols.
Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at
that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there
were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent of the
population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the
press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come
in with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up
practically everything.

The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world
to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the
Germans resented that.

The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I
say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned
them. The same way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or
the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an
enemy and brought about our defeat.

After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam.
Jews from every country in the world attended this meeting in July
1933. And they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every
Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist or no
matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of
the world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what
the Germans told them. So what did the Jews do?

In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of
Jews in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer,
who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the
whole conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer
to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio
broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said,
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are
now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going
to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide
boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are
dependent upon their export business." And it is a fact that two
thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only
be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So if Germany
could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to
starve. There was just not enough food for more than one third of the
population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, and which was
printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer
boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of
self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the
National Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember,
where everybody was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid
down by the New Deal, and which was declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world
declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you
couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the
words "made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth
Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of
crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted
if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were
picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth,
something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a
store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a
family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found
stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany."
Well, they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20
years, since I've been observing women's legs for many years and it's
been a long time since I've seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw
Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs
saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that time,
not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There
was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there
was nothing.

Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a
boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our
industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They
naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores
owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a
storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany
into surrendering to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate
who their premier or chancellor was to be? Well, it was ridiculous.
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a
young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot
a German official, that the Germans really started to get rough with
the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and
having street fights and so forth.

Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's
meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use
it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews
was that they were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide
boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II,
because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary
for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was
going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew
that the Germans had decided that Europe is going to be Christian or
Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans decided they were
going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm. In
November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The
Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that
"Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as
we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon,
unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion
dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000
little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their
devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from
which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my
imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of
megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of
TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million
tons of TNT, when they were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs
that are being developed have a capacity of 200 megatons, and God
knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a
nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It
will take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War
I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The
Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere,
are determined that they are going to again use the United States to
help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their
world government. That is just as true as I am standing here. Not
alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is known
all over the world.

What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your
boys may be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it
any more than you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal
with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did
you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it.
You weren't permitted to know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew
it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.

Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was
liaison to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President
Wilson was elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was
"confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the
finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the
treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the
head of the table, and all the others, and I heard them drum into
President Wilson's brain the graduated income tax and what has become
the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with the
Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as
close as the two fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was
just as incompetent when it came to determining what was going on as a
newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while we all
slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So
the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled
you so much that you don't know whether you're coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness
who you find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his
testimony." I don't know what state you come from, but in New York
state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness told
one lie, disregard his testimony.

What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because
they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them
as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.) The eastern European
Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people
who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike
tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike
that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe.
They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the
time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries. The
Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so
powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars
would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they
were.

They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go
into the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was
also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the
world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his
kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith --
either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which
is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny,
miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the
state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and
Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues and
schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of
them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only
in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one
of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support
their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help
repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral
home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys
as your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel
and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews." But they are pagan Khazars who
were converted just the same as the Irish were converted. It is as
ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to
call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620
A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their
religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia,
from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 million
Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were
lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs
must be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief
that had its origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When
the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and
imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't
become a different people. They were the same people, but they had
accepted Christianity as a religious faith.

These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a
Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe.
Because their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the
matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody
had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the
Khazars became what we call today Jews. Now imagine how silly it was
for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to
use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their
ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie
than that? Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the
radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they
have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes
talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe
that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough.
You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black
white. And nobody could blame you.

That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all
the misery that has befallen the world.

Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so
sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here
to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of
Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first
prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You
repeat three times a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that
prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath,
vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months shall
be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be
a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or
effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that whenever you take an
oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre prayer that
you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from
fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can
depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in
1916. We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and
for the same reason.

The above speech was given by Benjamin H. Freedman at the Willard
Hotel in Washington, D. C. in 1961.
Other books and tapes on this subject are available from:
National Vanguard Books <http://www.natall.com/free-speech/ >




http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Michael Ejercito
2012-07-14 16:48:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Topaz
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later.  If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org
http://www.ihr.org/   http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
T here were so many accomplices to the Holocaust.

'The killers were so many'

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
April 16, 1996

http://www.jeffjacoby.com/7771/the-killers-were-so-many

THERE IS LITTLE I can tell you about my father's murdered family. I
know that my father's father, David Jakubovic, was a pious Jew who had
a small farm in a tiny village in eastern Czechoslovakia. I know that
his mother, Leah, came from a larger town called Snina. I know that
his brother Zoltan was permanently injured as a child when an animal
kicked him in the head. Of his older sister Franceska and his two
youngest siblings, Yrvin and Alice, I know only their names.

I do know where the family was killed: at the Nazi death camp at
Auschwitz. And I know how: in a crowded gas chamber, by asphyxiation
from hydrogen cyanide. And I know when: May 28, 1944. And I know, of
course, why.

But who killed them -- that I don't know.

The killers were so many.

There were the Nazi officers supervising the murder operations at
Auschwitz that spring morning in 1944. There was the SS doctor who
"selected" the arriving Jews -- deciding who would be gassed at once
and who would be worked until they died of starvation and disease.
There were the guards who crammed the victims into the gas chambers
and screwed the airtight doors shut behind them. There were the
"disinfectors" who poured the Zyklon-B crystals into the ventilation
shafts. There was the camp commander, SS-Obersturmbannfuhrer Rudolf
Hoss. There was Adolf Hitler.

But the blood of my father's parents, brothers, and sisters was shed
by far more people than that.

David and Leah, Franceska and Alice, Zoltan and Yrvin were wiped out
as part of a genocidal enterprise whose dimensions still numb the
mind. It was the goal of the Germans to exterminate every Jew in
Europe -- to do so systematically, zealously, comprehensively. Never
before or since has the annihilation of an entire people been so
central to the ideology of a great power, or so ruthlessly and
efficiently pursued.

It was a huge undertaking. From every corner of the continent, from
the stylish cafes of Paris to the backward villages of Ukraine, Jews
were herded to their deaths. They were killed by shooting and by
gassing, by hanging and by drowning, by beating and by starving, by
burning and by electrocuting and by torture. Between 1938 and 1945,
the Nazis and their collaborators murdered two-thirds of Europe's
Jews. My father's father and mother and brothers and sisters made up 1
one-millionth of the total.

Fifty years on, the Holocaust is sometimes seen in caricature: as the
evil work of Hitler, Goebbels, and the Gestapo, with death camp guards
and a goose-stepping chorus of Storm Troops in the background. But
these were only the most notorious villains. They could have done
little without the tens of thousands of men and women -- murderers and
accessories to murder -- who staffed the Third Reich's immense
bureaucracy of persecution, isolation, and destruction.

Who killed David and Leah, Franceska and Alice, Zoltan and Yrvin? The
train engineers who transported them to Auschwitz. The railway
managers who provided the rolling stock. The local police who helped
the Germans round up Jews for deportation. The collectors and civil
servants who forced the Jews to surrender their valuables and
property. Accessories, all of them.

My father's loved ones were murdered by the men who released the
Zyklon-B into the gas chamber, but also by the men who ordered the
Zyklon-B. And by the firm that supplied it. And by the lawyers who
drew up the contract. And by the accountants who paid the bill.

For lawyers and accountants, too, played a role in liquidating 6
million Jews. The Holocaust was a complicated and expensive project.
It required lawyers and accountants no less than it required
crematorium operators. Auschwitz and Buchenwald and Treblinka didn't
spring into existence at the snap of Hitler's finger. Architects had
to draft the blueprints. Builders had to follow them. Engineers had to
install the equipment. Property agents had to acquire the land.

Not all of the perpetrators were sadistic SS men. Many -- very many --
were ordinary people doing "ordinary" jobs: Scheduling trains. Cutting
payroll checks. Sewing uniforms. Delivering mail. Part of the Final
Solution was machine-gunning children into the ravine at Babi Yar.
Part of it was ordering more bullets when supplies ran low.

When the Jakubovices stepped out of that stinking cattle car to be
hustled off to die, who pushed them up the ramp? Wasn't it the
legislators who had written laws stripping Jews of every legal
protection? Wasn't it the schoolteachers who taught German children
that Jews were pestilential vermin, the enemies of the Fatherland?
Wasn't it the "journalists" who wrote for Der Sturmer, the grotesquely
anti-Semitic newspaper whose single theme was vileness of Jews? Wasn't
it the German church leaders, who not only refused to speak out in
defense of the victims but actively helped the Nazis by supplying
"Certificates of Aryan Descent" to their members?

"The destruction of the Jews was not centralized," writes Raul
Hilberg, the eminent Holocaust scholar. "The anti-Jewish work was
carried out in the civil service, the military, business, and the Nazi
party. All components of German organized life were drawn into this
undertaking. Every agency was a contributor; every specialization was
utilized; and every stratum of society was represented in the
envelopment of the victims."

Who killed David and Leah, Franceska and Alice, Zoltan and Yrvin? It
would be easier to say who didn't.

(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe).
Topaz
2012-07-15 10:23:31 UTC
Permalink
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absense
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

Gray Guest
2012-07-10 00:51:06 UTC
Permalink
Topaz <***@hotmail.com> wrote in news:***@4ax.com:
Why is it you mudfuckers can never keep on topic?
--
Refusenik #1
Topaz
2012-07-10 21:05:15 UTC
Permalink
THE ENEMIES of White people around the world have a pathological
love affair with the term 'White supremacist' whenever they report
on or describe White people who act in a collective manner, no
matter how benign, on behalf of their own group interests..
However, the same people who decry 'White supremacism' seem to have a
difficult time describing the actions of non-Whites acting on behalf
of their group interests, often violently, as supremacists of any
kind.
And never mind the fact that most so-called White supremacists
simply work to promote separate living space and political
independence from Jewish or other non-White influence.
All right then, I have a question for you about this 'White
supremacism': where is it? Where is this so-called White
supremacism? Have you seen it?

Far too many White people in America and around the world are
race-mixing and aborting themselves out of existence. Our
politicians are allowing record Third World immigration into our
White ancestral homelands. Our White corporate 'free traders' and
White globalists continue to impoverish us as they send our jobs
overseas, and our White politicians send our White soldiers to die
in a senseless war in Iraq for Israel, soldiers who will never sire
another generation of their own kind.

Does that sound like 'White supremacism'?
We continue to allow the media masters to produce their filth,
surpassing each other in obscenity as they abuse our people in print
and on screen. Does that sound like White supremacy?
Ubiquitous misinformation in the media and in the schools has made
too many of us ashamed of our nature and our traditions; our
accomplishments, we are told, belong to the entire world. Even most
Whites-who know they're being lied to-are still too scared to
organize for our common good, because Jewish supremacists such as
the Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, their
allies in the media, and their lapdog politicians attack any who
try to stand up to them; even as Jews and other non-Whites are
encouraged, even paid, to organize.

How "supreme" is that, my friends?
If you recall, the recent demonstrations of Mestizo invaders across
America bore a simple message: 'We claim your land! We claim your
jobs! We want your women! We demand your future! If you don't hand
us America, then you are racist pigs!'
Where was the massive so-called White supremacist backlash to these
invaders? Where was the White resistance to this clear and present
danger to our posterity? With the exception of the street activism
of National Vanguard members and supporters and a few other stalwart
patriots, I didn't see it. Did you?

So, where were all the White people during these Mestizo
demonstrations? Well, my guess is they were figuring out how they're
going to pay their next tax bill; working longer hours for less and
less inflation-reduced take-home pay; shopping at yet another new
Wal-Mart for the only kind of goods many can afford, Chinese junk;
watching ball games; attending yet another anti-White motion
picture, and so on. Some are blind, happily embracing their lives as
the new peons in a multiracial America, while others know something
is wrong, but haven't yet figured it out. Some know exactly what is
happening, but are afraid to say anything, falsely believing they
are all alone in their beliefs.
Fear is the dominant note in this funeral march.

Everywhere our borders have been opened and the
new elite teaches our children that intermarriage is good and
desirable. Everywhere the new elite teaches our children that to
defend our genetic heritage is the very definition of evil. The end
result, if trends continue, will be genocide.

There is no fortress against this persistent onslaught. There are no
mighty gates on the horizon swinging open to offer us sanctuary. The
Other is in every city, every county, every town, every hamlet now.
The Opponent continues to work overtime to convince us all that
White racial consciousness is "evil," because they know that we are
the only real obstacle to their malevolent plans for a global
plantation. They are the real supremacists. Not us.

History has set a task for us. It is to dispel the fog of fear that
immobilizes the sleeping White giant of our people. It is to change
the now-dominant note of fear to one of determination. It is to turn
that funeral march into a march of triumph.
National Vanguard. Our time has come and our time is now.

I'm Frank Roman. Thank you for listening and I shall speak with you
again.



http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...