Discussion:
Justice Dept. Blocked in Bid to Shield Trump From Rape Defamation Suit
(too old to reply)
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 17:51:01 UTC
Permalink
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.

By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser

Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET

A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.

The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.

Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Mattb
2020-10-27 17:53:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 18:21:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
Mattb
2020-10-27 18:45:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 18:54:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Mattb
2020-10-27 18:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'. What was the slander she
will need to prove?
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 19:04:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.

Fuck, you're stupid.
Mattb
2020-10-27 19:52:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 19:58:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her. For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
Mattb
2020-10-27 20:02:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 20:04:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
Mattb
2020-10-27 20:07:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.

End of Discussion.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 20:18:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Mattb
2020-10-27 23:52:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did. Rudy you have now moved to be in dumber than WY.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence? I'm betting you can't and
Rudy is only lying yet again.

Rudy, maybe it is time for a grammar flame.............
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-27 23:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.

matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"

Prof. Canoza:
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."

matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"What is she suing over?"

Prof. Canoza:
"Defamation, you fuckwit."

matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."

Prof. Canoza:
"Fine."

I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
Mattb
2020-10-28 00:05:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really? Rudy you are a liar as normal.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-28 00:08:22 UTC
Permalink
On 10/27/2020 5:05 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Mattb
2020-10-28 03:22:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/27/2020 5:05 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-28 14:36:59 UTC
Permalink
On 10/27/2020 8:22 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.

You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Mattb
2020-10-29 12:18:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/27/2020 8:22 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for. Rudy you
liberals are such idiots.
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-29 14:20:01 UTC
Permalink
On 10/29/2020 5:18 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for.
Trump called her a liar.

You lied. You claimed I said she didn't have to prove she was defamed. I
never said that. You lied.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Still a liar. You didn't vote for the Libertarian.
Mattb
2020-10-29 18:47:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/29/2020 5:18 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for.
Trump called her a liar.
Then doesn't she have to prove she isn't?
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You claimed I said she didn't have to prove she was defamed. I
never said that. You lied.
You are like Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Still a liar. You didn't vote for the Libertarian.
Rudy Canoza
2020-10-29 19:10:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/29/2020 5:18 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for.
Trump called her a liar.
Then doesn't she have to prove she isn't?
And?
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You claimed I said she didn't have to prove she was defamed. I
never said that. You lied.
I am like Trump.
Yes. Trump lies and you lie.
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Still a liar. You didn't vote for the Libertarian.
Mattb
2020-10-29 20:41:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/29/2020 5:18 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for.
Trump called her a liar.
Then doesn't she have to prove she isn't?
And?
Then, she has to prove the rape happened....
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You claimed I said she didn't have to prove she was defamed. I
never said that. You lied.
Jonathon Ball is like Trump.
bruce bowser
2023-03-19 17:48:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
On 10/27/2020 8:22 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking
Post by Mattb
Post by Mattb
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
"What is she suing over?"
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she
was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for. Rudy you
liberals are such idiots.
Post by Rudy Canoza
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation,
and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your
hero Trump.
Post by Mattb
Post by Mattb
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Mattb
Post by Rudy Canoza
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it.
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit.
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Its clear that you still crap in ya pants and throw it.

Gronk
2020-10-28 04:18:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rudy Canoza
Post by Rudy Canoza
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all.  The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
   Won't she now have to prove she was raped?
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit.
Great Crom, it's in the frickin' subject line!!!! Is he REALLY this stupid?
Loading...